Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurbankKarl

I agree she's crazy. I couldn't believe how she started out how she respected the court's right to remove a guy with a cell phone, but that the court cannot rule for a revote.


421 posted on 02/04/2005 4:20:39 PM PST by Vicki (Truth and Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]


To: Vicki

This goes to show you that there is nothing an attorney wouldn't say; no matter how stupid it might be.

You can tell that even she is embarassed. A smart attorney woud have told her associates, "You make that B. S. argument, because I'm not going to do it."


432 posted on 02/04/2005 4:23:32 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

To: Vicki
"....but that the court cannot rule for a revote."

Do you think the judge might get a little ticked off from her telling him what he can and can't do?

I bet he gives her a what for.

442 posted on 02/04/2005 4:28:39 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson