By no means an expert, but my impression is that, generally, if given a solid case that is presented strongly enough, they will likely rule favorably.
That said, if they can find "wiggle room", I am of the opinion that they would avail themselves and vote their fEEEEEEELings.
Not exactly the most comforting notion, is it?
There is no wiggle room. Slam dunk for a re-vote.
I am a true cynic when it comes to democrats finding the 'wiggle' they need to hold onto their power. I am betting this goes to the Federal Courts via Bush-Gore provisions.
Of course that happens if the state supreme court sides with Gregoire. Here are some wiggle points.
1. Felons registering or voting but can only be contested before election.
2. Chelan County Court wrong in denying venue to legislature.
3. No constitutional provision for a revote.
etc.
I'm thinking they need to get this to the federal courts asap for a ruling. But any insights into real picture of state supreme behavior is much appreciated. I would love to be wrong.