Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; hedgetrimmer; calcowgirl
You know what, if we continue to allow them to do so, there won't be any tomorrow for the way of life we cherish.

Especially when they are pushed and promoted by governors with Rs behind their names.

29 posted on 02/03/2005 11:16:00 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: farmfriend

Schwarzenegger is about 1/100,000ths as important as the NGOs themselves are. That's because their members are out there helping to network these across the nation, one community at a time. Selling grandma and grandpa on the concept of willing their property to the state or some conservency is one of their methods. Another is for them to convince communities that they should buy up land and place it off limits.

Schwarzenegger was an idiot for doing what he did, but he'll be gone in a few years and the conservancies will still be around. We need to focus on destroying them. Frankly destroying Arnold's future viability as a candidate would a a good secondary goal.

Let's face it, the conservancy you are upset about, would have become reality just about no matter what. Only if Tom would have won would it have been struck down. That wasn't going to happen.


76 posted on 02/04/2005 12:03:04 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson