Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China blasts threatened US deadline on yuan as wrong way to handle issue
channelnews asia ^

Posted on 02/03/2005 6:10:26 PM PST by maui_hawaii

BEIJING : China said a threatened US bill giving it six months to revalue its currency, the yuan, would be the wrong way to handle the sensitive issue.

"We believe this is not a way to resolve differences," foreign ministry spokesman Kong Quan told a regular briefing.

"Every country's economic and financial policy are implemented and established based on the country's specific situation," he said.

A least a dozen US senators are said to have agreed to co-sponsor the bill which would give China "a window of 180 days" to revalue the yuan or face a 27.5 percent tariff on all Chinese manufactured goods entering the United States.

It is expected to be introduced into the US Senate as early as Friday.

A ranking state-employed economist said the government was unlikely to be intimidated by such a move.

"China doesn't have to change the yuan exchange rate under pressure from the outside," said Zhu Baoliang, a researcher at the State Information Center, an elite Beijing think tank.

"If the Chinese government wants to change its policy, it should be at a time when it's required by domestic needs," he told AFP.

"Personally I agree the yuan should change at a proper time but in accordance with the domestic economic situation, not because of international pressure," Zhu said.

The yuan, now fixed at 8.28 to the dollar, is kept in a narrow band by the People's Bank of China, the central bank. This level is considered too weak by many financial observers and made worse by recent weakening of the dollar.

The United States trade deficit with China is ballooning and may have hit 150 billion dollars last year or one-fourth the US deficit with all countries, analysts say.

"Ensuring and maintaining the rapid, healthy and stable development of China's economy helps not only China but also the mutually beneficial economic and trade cooperation with Asia and other countries in the world," Kong said.

China will send two senior officials to the G7 meeting in London this week but it is unlikely Beijing will make any major announcement on its fixed currency system, analysts say.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; currency; walmartisyourfriend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Look at it this way... we are sending them to the ultimate of all collection agencies...
1 posted on 02/03/2005 6:10:26 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

they are gonna play hardball:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000085&sid=apHjcmFIRmoQ&refer=europe


2 posted on 02/03/2005 6:11:04 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

repeal MFN for china now.


3 posted on 02/03/2005 6:11:51 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

US should have introduced this bill years ago...


4 posted on 02/03/2005 6:14:56 PM PST by tmp02 (Don't come to the US. We too are dipping our bullets in pig's blood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
"Every country's economic and financial policy are implemented and established based on the country's specific situation," he said.

I agree. So, the United States has the right to impose a 30% tarrif on Chinese goods entering the United States.

5 posted on 02/03/2005 6:18:41 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Unvarnished Truth - Your Mileage May Vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Good link.


6 posted on 02/03/2005 6:20:33 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

The WTO will whack us on the head for this, count on it.


7 posted on 02/03/2005 6:21:15 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe

You forgot. We are supposed to take one for the team. Their team that is...


8 posted on 02/03/2005 6:21:51 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Even if they do it won't mean anything. All China will do is limit the amount of soybeans we export to them...

Oh, the horror....

The WTO has no authority in and of itself.

9 posted on 02/03/2005 6:23:16 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
China blasts threatened US deadline on yuan as wrong way to handle issue

Heat getting to them? Must be on the right track!

10 posted on 02/03/2005 6:23:37 PM PST by Coyoteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

When it hits their interests we are supposed to be 'rational'. When they do things against our interests 'its their right' to do whatever it is.


11 posted on 02/03/2005 6:26:19 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Interesting. If the issue ends up as a wider international issue, the Euroweenies are going to back the US -- because they are getting screwed by the Chinese actions.


12 posted on 02/03/2005 6:43:12 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

No, see #12.


13 posted on 02/03/2005 6:43:57 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
""Every country's economic and financial policy are implemented and established based on the country's specific situation," he said."

And our specific situation is that we need to impose a tariff on Chinese goods to adjust for their manipulation of the exchange rate, until such time as they float the currency.

I wonder if something gets lost in the translation or if they truly are as mind-numbingly arrogant and hypocritical as they sound.
14 posted on 02/03/2005 6:44:47 PM PST by lame_internet_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: expatpat

I agree.


16 posted on 02/03/2005 6:48:10 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lame_internet_name

A need is a need. I say we satisfy our need.


17 posted on 02/03/2005 6:49:28 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 704 HAUSER ST

I would think thats about right...


18 posted on 02/03/2005 6:50:14 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Personally, I don't know why we are doing this. If they want to subsidize the American consumer, then let them.


19 posted on 02/03/2005 7:33:57 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

because we are exporting our industrial and technology base to them, and the jobs and tax base they provide, so they can produce the finished goods they export back to us.


20 posted on 02/03/2005 7:35:18 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson