Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
"On the species level, all the species we found from the Challenger Deep are quite new," researcher Hiroshi Kitazato said vie e-mail. The outer shapes are similar to other known foraminifera, but details of their structure differ ...

We were talking, a day or so ago, about "new" phyla. This is the sort of thing I was thinking about. (Whether this is a good example or not, I haven't a clue.) It could be happening, or be on the verge of happening, almost all the time. It's difficult to know except after millions of years of hindsight.

22 posted on 02/03/2005 12:34:17 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping! Indeed, I wonder how they will date the emergence of it absent a geologic record?


39 posted on 02/03/2005 1:57:59 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"We were talking, a day or so ago, about "new" phyla. This is the sort of thing I was thinking about. (Whether this is a good example or not, I haven't a clue.) It could be happening, or be on the verge of happening, almost all the time. It's difficult to know except after millions of years of hindsight."

As a bugologist, IMHO, these are more likely an old group, just newly discovered, especially since the authors said they were related to the oldest branch of the forams.


48 posted on 02/03/2005 6:16:12 PM PST by furball4paws ("These are Microbes."... "You have crobes?" BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson