Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

"We were talking, a day or so ago, about "new" phyla. This is the sort of thing I was thinking about. (Whether this is a good example or not, I haven't a clue.) It could be happening, or be on the verge of happening, almost all the time. It's difficult to know except after millions of years of hindsight."

As a bugologist, IMHO, these are more likely an old group, just newly discovered, especially since the authors said they were related to the oldest branch of the forams.


48 posted on 02/03/2005 6:16:12 PM PST by furball4paws ("These are Microbes."... "You have crobes?" BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: furball4paws
... these are more likely an old group, just newly discovered, especially since the authors said they were related to the oldest branch of the forams.

Seems likely. I was just using this as an example. A new body type could pop up. In a crowded world it would have a tough time, and it would take forever for it -- and its ever-varying progeny -- to be recognized as a new phylum. The whole conjecture was in response to a question about "why don't we see new phyla"?

50 posted on 02/03/2005 6:23:30 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson