Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidSupplySide
It doesn't matter whether the buyer (sales tax) or seller (flat income tax) bears the statutory burden of the tax. The economic burden (who actually bears the burden of the tax) is exactly the same between them.

The ultimate burden is the same, assuming equivalent activities. But under a consumption tax, the consumer (i.e., the ultimate taxpayer in either system) has more control over whether or not he actually pays tax. Apart from spending on bare necessities, he can sit on his money until he decides it's time to spend it. The government only gets his money when the conditions are such that he's willing to spend, which puts added incentive on government to keep taxes down.

705 posted on 02/07/2005 2:23:49 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
But under a consumption tax, the consumer (i.e., the ultimate taxpayer in either system) has more control over whether or not he actually pays tax.

Both the flat income tax and the sales tax are consumption taxes. I'm not sure what your point is.

706 posted on 02/07/2005 6:57:44 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson