To: Servant of the 9
I hope it is as heavy as the 500 guns are. I've shot a .454 Casull in Ruger, and it's the only gun ever to split my grip when I fired it. I shot a 500 two weeks back, and I kept that one down remarkably well. My word is that the 500s are more manageable than the 454. The trouble is, I already have a lot of 45 Colt around.
I don't know if anyone else had the same experiences. I hope the range gets one in to rent so I can try this new 460.
5 posted on
02/02/2005 12:07:22 PM PST by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
To: AZ_Cowboy
Just read your post to my husband. He states the .480 Ruger is even worse that the .454 Casull (similar to the contrast between a .38 special vs. a .357 magnum).
41 posted on
02/02/2005 12:58:53 PM PST by
Quilla
To: AZ_Cowboy
I've shot a .454 Casull in Ruger, and it's the only gun ever to split my grip when I fired it. I've got a Ruger 454; use a batting glove and it works perfectly.
57 posted on
02/02/2005 1:32:19 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: AZ_Cowboy
A lady at my pistol/rifle range has a Ruger .454 Casull, and it has some kick! I'll stick with my Redhawk, that's enough "mule" for me!
89 posted on
02/02/2005 5:40:49 PM PST by
F105-D ThunderChief
(That "THUD" you heard was the Collapse of the DemocRats!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson