Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Secretary Aims to Revive Bunker-Buster Nuke Study
NTI Global Security Newswire ^ | 2/1/2005 | NTI staff

Posted on 02/01/2005 8:12:27 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is pressing for funding to restart the study of the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator, the Washington Post reported today (see GSN, Dec. 16, 2004).

“I think we should request funds in FY06 and FY07 to complete the study,” Rumsfeld wrote in a Jan. 10 memo to then-Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham. “Our staffs have spoken about funding the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator study to support its completion by April 2007.”

A Defense Department spokesman yesterday confirmed the contents of the memo, saying the Pentagon “supports completion of the study” of the bunker-buster nuclear weapon.

The Bush administration’s budget for fiscal 2006, scheduled for release next week, is expected to include $10.3 million to resume study of the weapon, an Energy Department official said yesterday.

Representative David Hobson (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee, last year led successful efforts to eliminate funding for the bunker-buster study in 2005.

“Until we see the budget request, it is premature to comment on what might or might not be in it,” a Hobson spokesman said yesterday.

“The administration is missing a key opportunity to make good on the congressional decision last year if it were to renew funding of the study,” said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association. “It sends the wrong signal to the international community on the U.S. approach on nonproliferation, and Congress may again reject the request” (Walter Pincus, Washington Post, Feb. 1).


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bunkerbusters; dukenukem; good; kaboom; miltech; neutrontan
Rummy made a good call here.
1 posted on 02/01/2005 8:12:27 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Another excellent Rummy decision!


2 posted on 02/01/2005 8:20:44 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

ABSO-FREAKIN-LUTELY!

This is something even the environmentalists should be supporting, after all - who could possibly be opposed to the concept of keeping Hiroshima/Nagasaki-sizeed damage below ground, and avoiding atmospheric contamination, while eliminating the toxic social pollution caused by maggots like Kim Jong ILL and other tin-horn dictators of his ilk?


3 posted on 02/01/2005 8:22:13 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Somebody has been remembering there Goldwater teachings well.


4 posted on 02/01/2005 8:24:58 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Kewl!


5 posted on 02/01/2005 8:28:22 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Smokin'!!


U.S. Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld (shown in a Jan. 26
photo with Senator John Warner (R-Va.)
has expressed support for completing
a study into nuclear bunker-busting bombs
(AFP photo/Brendan Smialowski).

6 posted on 02/01/2005 8:28:40 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Gun-control is a death sentence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
...who could possibly be opposed ...

Well, it seems Rep. Hobson from Ohio is one.

7 posted on 02/01/2005 8:36:13 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
...who could possibly be opposed ...
Well, it seems Rep. Hobson from Ohio is one.


Hobson? Oh well, you can't eat corn on the cob at a picnic without a few kernels showing up later in the toilet bowl.
8 posted on 02/01/2005 8:38:31 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
From the article:

Representative David Hobson (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee, last year led successful efforts to eliminate funding for the bunker-buster study in 2005.

9 posted on 02/01/2005 8:55:21 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Well, it's like this. We Yankees can develop nice, new, quiet penetrators, or we can use the good, old cratering devices when the time comes to use one or the other. I'm all for letting the complaining world decide (in favor of my favorite old devices), but then I'm not as nice as our Secretary of Defense. I think our older ones make the sky prettier.


10 posted on 02/01/2005 9:30:05 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Representative David Hobson (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee, last year led successful efforts to eliminate funding for the bunker-buster study in 2005.

(R)?!?!?

'R' my azz!!

Hobson needs to be taken to the damn woodshed and beeotchslapped a few dozen times until he sees the light.

If he doesn't wise up, bounce him out of the GOP, we've got enough of a majority in the House that we can throw a RINO to the 'Rats and not even skip a beat.
11 posted on 02/01/2005 9:50:59 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Rumsfeld bump!!


12 posted on 02/02/2005 5:18:57 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Gun-control is a death sentence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Thanks for posting that pic!! My favorite. I stood on the platform overlooking this thing, and it was awesome.


13 posted on 02/02/2005 7:07:36 AM PST by nuclady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

It's needed.

We can't penetrate deep enough so we need a blast large enough to still have the desired affect. It's hard to pound deep into the earth.

Red6


14 posted on 02/02/2005 8:02:07 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson