If it picks up steam, ping it -- if it fades, let it die a deserved death, it's the same old whines.
But I have to comment on this creationist howler: " In fact, the retina is an immensely complex organ, comparable (if not exceeding) in complexity to the most sophisticated super-computer man has ever built".
Horse manure! The retina is a simple structure of stacked neurons, just repeated a bajillion times. The creationist canard above was probably one of those "read a science article but didn't understand it" moments that are so common for creationists -- in this case, reading that the data processing VOLUME of the retina is freaking huge, and cranks through as many bits of information as a supercomputer, but that's *NOT* the same as it being as *complex* as a supercomputer. A fiber-optic data cable transmits even more data faster than the retina, but it's still just a long strand of glass and isn't "complex". And biological systems are *great* at taking simple structures and replicating them literally millions or billions of times over. That's not "complexity" or "design", that's mindless repetition.
I really wish creationists would try to *learn* something about science, biology, and living things before they attempted to babble about them or "instruct" biologists on what they're allegedly "overlooking"...
If it's so "simple" why can't you make one?! What arrogance.