Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Commandments park site backed (AZ Dem Gov Finally gets it!)
Arizona Daily Star - CAPITOL MEDIA SERVICES ^ | 02/01/05 | http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/news/59431.php

Posted on 02/01/2005 3:44:00 PM PST by SandRat

Napolitano is among group that supports it.

PHOENIX - Democrat Gov. Janet Napolitano joined Monday with a group urging the U.S. Supreme Court to let a 6-foot-tall monument of the Ten Commandments remain in a public park across the street from the state Capitol.

The group, the Center for Arizona Policy, promotes what it calls pro-family legislation in Arizona. In court papers, it said these kinds of monuments have "a valid secular purpose."

Peter Gentala, the organization's attorney, got not only the governor to join in the plea but also Republican Secretary of State Jan Brewer and 38 of Arizona's 90 state lawmakers.

Officially, the case before the nation's high court relates to a monument in Austin. A federal appeals court has rejected efforts to have it removed.

But there is a virtually identical monument in Phoenix's Wesley Bolin Park, directly east of the Arizona House and Senate buildings. Any ruling on the legality of the Texas monument will determine the fate of its Phoenix counterpart.

The decision by Napolitano came as no surprise to Eleanor Eisenberg, director of the Arizona Civil Liberties Union.

She noted the governor opposed efforts by her organization two years ago to have the monument removed. But a lawsuit threatened at that time has been held in abeyance awaiting the outcome of the Texas case.

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on March 2.

Napolitano does not believe the monument amounts to a state endorsement of religion prohibited by the First Amendment, said Tim Nelson, the governor's chief counsel.

"It's one of many, many monuments out there" in Wesley Bolin Park, Nelson said.

Other monuments in the park include one to Armenians who the display says were martyred in Turkey early in the last century, and another to Jewish war veterans.

"One is not more prominent than the other," Nelson said.

Gentala, in his legal papers, said there is no reason to move the Arizona monument.

"Like Texas, the people of Arizona, by the decision of their elected officials, display a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of their State Capitol," he wrote. "Arizona's Ten Commandments monument is one of the many ways the state acknowledges the role of religious faith in the lives of its citizens."

Gentala also noted that the state expressly acknowledges the existence of God: The state seal bears the motto Ditat Deus, which means "God enriches."

What the U.S. Supreme Court will do in this case is unclear.

Four years ago, the justices refused to disturb a ruling by a different federal appellate court that concluded a similar monument had to go. It stood in front of the municipal building at Elkhart, Ind.

At that time, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that one thing that convinced him the monument was religious and not secular is that the letters of First Commandment, "I AM the LORD thy God," were larger than in the following nine.

"The graphic emphasis placed on those first lines is rather hard to square with the proposition that the monument expresses no particular religious preference," Stevens wrote.

The Arizona monument is etched in the same way. And, like the Indiana monument, it also has two Stars of David and a symbol composed of the Greek letters "chi" and "rho" superimposed on each other that Stevens said represents Christ.

But in 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to disturb a Colorado Supreme Court decision that allowed the Ten Commandments to remain on the Colorado Capitol grounds.

The Arizona monument originally was located right next to the existing Capitol buildings. It was accepted at a ceremony in 1964 by then-Gov. Paul Fannin, with Catholic, Protestant and Jewish representatives in attendance.

The Phoenix Gazette reported at the time that the monument was one of many the Eagles, a civic organization, purchased at $500 apiece to give to state governments across the nation.

It was moved across the street to the newly dedicated park more than a decade later.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 10commandments; church; government; publicsquare; state

1 posted on 02/01/2005 3:44:01 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; Radix; HiJinx; Spiff; JackelopeBreeder; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; ...

Now she's standing up for the 10 Commandments, finally!


2 posted on 02/01/2005 3:44:39 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

On the outside she is standing but on the inside she is hoping that the SC makes them take it down.


3 posted on 02/01/2005 4:12:49 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

El Napo's pretty shrewd. She knows she's in a blue state. Good for her on this one.


4 posted on 02/01/2005 4:21:20 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Thanks for the ping!


5 posted on 02/01/2005 9:11:23 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Bump!


6 posted on 02/01/2005 11:15:44 PM PST by windchime (Hillary: "I've always been a preying person")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson