1 posted on
02/01/2005 3:37:05 PM PST by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
George Bushes fault - I am proud to say
To: RWR8189
BUSTED! the Red Dye No. 2 Salesmen Conspiracy
To: RWR8189
It was the boegyman! Didn't they tell you?
/Sarcasm
Obviously, this was to the article author, not the poster. We're all friends here.
4 posted on
02/01/2005 3:41:32 PM PST by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
To: RWR8189
In my state, one county went from red to blue. Alger County in the UP which is staunchly democrat.
Manistee, Alpena, Monroe, Macomb, Calhoun, Iron, Clare, Ogemaw, Roscommon, and Iosco all switched. Most are rural and socially conservative.
5 posted on
02/01/2005 3:41:33 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("Guilty! Guilty in the first degree....")
To: RWR8189
The five reasons they give:
1. A wartime president
Voters were drawn to Bush by memories of the 9/11 attacks and a reluctance to change leaders in the midst of war.
2. Who was tough enough?
Democrats were damaged by the perception that the party and its nominees are weak on national security.
3. Values mattered
Values led some voters to Bush
4. 'The move-in people'
Republicans benefited from demographic shifts.
5. Nuts and bolts
Republicans out-campaigned Democrats.
Close but no cigar. Kerry is a liar and no sane person has trust in a liar. Gay marriages was also another show stopper - Kerry was for it despite his flip-flops. Kerry was also a very despicable character. The ultimate fact is the people spoke and they simply didn't want Kerry as President.
6 posted on
02/01/2005 3:43:08 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: RWR8189
Easy, the media decided that from now on blue would not mean challenger, blue means Democrat for the MSM.
Seriously, the sleeping gian awoke.
To: RWR8189
this>
10 posted on
02/01/2005 3:46:32 PM PST by
petercooper
(Liberalism = Idealism; Conservatism = Realism)
To: RWR8189
11 posted on
02/01/2005 3:47:03 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(Why is it that people who know the least know it the loudest?)
To: RWR8189
Jill Lawrence and company are merely looking at the same nuts and bolts - almost as if Nancy Pelosi had written the "talking points". They miss the point of the red states and President Bush's election -- near entirely, IMHO.
14 posted on
02/01/2005 3:49:17 PM PST by
Alia
To: RWR8189
When I moved to Lake Jackson Texas in 1973 I could not find another Republican. I kept my mouth shut about politics. Now it is RARE to find a Democrat around here......
16 posted on
02/01/2005 3:54:53 PM PST by
buffyt
(Condi Rice for President 2008 !!!!)
To: RWR8189
The blue tumors are getting smaller and denser:
18 posted on
02/01/2005 3:57:28 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: RWR8189
I'm in Boone co and the city of Columbia proper thinks it Haight Ashbury circa '68. Its or rather they're really pathetic, teens whose parents are burnt out hippydippy types with thier grateful dead skateboards and tiedye T shirts, inscence shops (THE NEW ECONOMY), enough leftwing tenured never got their hands dirty professor types to confuse the minds of whole generations of youth, That Bush won here is like Sharon winning in Tehran.
22 posted on
02/01/2005 4:06:34 PM PST by
wildcatf4f3
(out of the sun)
To: RWR8189
IMHO the media finally awakened to ---
RED was associated with [gasp!]
communism (USSR)!What better way to portray Republicans?
At least in their little twisted, socialist minds.
25 posted on
02/01/2005 4:14:45 PM PST by
Budge
(<>< Sit Nomen Domini benedictum. <><)
To: RWR8189
32 posted on
02/01/2005 5:05:05 PM PST by
x
To: RWR8189
Well, I Say Family Values!
To: RWR8189
The most interesting thing about this article is that it is being printed in a national newspaper three months after the election, and after a thousand basically identical articles have been published and broadcast all over the country.
What does this mean, coming on the eve of the SOTU speech?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson