Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paudio
"He ceded the moral high ground to the other side."

Uhh.... The baby-killing side has a "moral high ground"?

13 posted on 02/01/2005 2:25:28 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
"Uhh.... The baby-killing side has a "moral high ground"?"

Why, YES -- didn't you know??!!!

People like Gloria Feldt would say that it is just positively immoral to deny someone her (and maybe his) "reproductive rights".

And if you press someone like Gloria Feldt, she will tell you tthat "reproductive rights" means the right of every person to decide for his self or her self whether or not to become a parent.

And, just for good measure, they will tell you that it is immoral for the State to deny the right to choose.

WHat they are really saying, though, is that it is immoral for the state to tell women that they cannot kill their unborn babies.

ANd they seriously beleive that that is a moral argument.

17 posted on 02/01/2005 2:35:41 PM PST by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson