Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOA On Offense As New Congress Convenes
Gun Owners of America ^ | February 1, 2005 | Gun Owners of America

Posted on 02/01/2005 1:53:15 PM PST by blackie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: clamper1797
The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security!
21 posted on 02/01/2005 2:48:14 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower


Will it pass?


22 posted on 02/01/2005 2:53:56 PM PST by jsmith48 (www.isupatriot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grut

Good. Keep them there.


23 posted on 02/01/2005 2:55:07 PM PST by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blackie

I would like citizens allowed to be armed in national parks. We've had lots of killings of govt. mandated unarmed victims in National Parks here in the west. This is a travesty, and unlike the GOA bill doesn't require the Feds to stick there nose into state laws, it only asks them to do a better job on the laws for Federal property.


24 posted on 02/01/2005 3:08:06 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
Hi All-

GOA, NRA, & JPFO BUMP! I'm especially fond of GOA these days...

~ Blue Jays ~

25 posted on 02/01/2005 3:15:43 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

But the 2nd hasnt been incorporated, so it wont count in cali... /Sarc


26 posted on 02/01/2005 3:27:39 PM PST by Gilbo_3 (Patience is a virtue, but it aint one of mine !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grut
It's called "Canada" and they're already planning to move there anyway.

No, they're not. They keep saying that to tease us, but they never deliver (like everything else in their life).

27 posted on 02/01/2005 3:54:05 PM PST by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Roger that, Jack Black!

Be Ever Vigilant!

PS great profile page!


28 posted on 02/01/2005 4:02:20 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blackie

Somebody ought to sue the 'Rat Party for preeing an agenda of victim disarmament for the past 35 years.


29 posted on 02/01/2005 4:05:24 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Roger that, Blood of Tyrants!

You too, have a great profile page!

FMCDH!


30 posted on 02/01/2005 4:11:06 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tabi Katz

We're all in this together and the common enemy is the anti-gun dem party.

Let's keep voting them out of office.


31 posted on 02/01/2005 4:21:15 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; All

I agree. I apologize for appearing to pit one organization against the other - we're all good guys here.

The background check is a particular pet peeve of mine, as I don't see why Uncle Sam has to stick his nose into my business before allowing me to defend myself. Criminals will continue to get their weapons illegally, and those of us who are fit to live in free society shouldn't need a special license to enjoy our Constitutional rights.

Sadly, I don't see this going away anytime soon, as the gun-grabbers are going to scream bloody murder. Give a lib an inch, and you'll never get it back.


32 posted on 02/01/2005 4:38:52 PM PST by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blackie; Joe Brower

Thanks for the post and the ping guys.

I'll do the congresscritter thing in the AM.


33 posted on 02/01/2005 10:18:22 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian ( Do laws that restrict your rights make you feel safer?><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Thanks for the ping


34 posted on 02/02/2005 3:01:18 AM PST by P8riot (Stupid is forever. Ignorance can be fixed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tabi Katz
Let's ship the anti-gunners off to a remote land where only thugs and government agents are armed. Let's see how long they stay there

These are many such places. Cuba, China, North Korea, and New York City all qualify.

35 posted on 02/02/2005 3:37:49 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blackie
instead of passing more laws that will throw some crumbs the way of certain gunowners the goa needs to focus all of their energy and money on simpley repealing the blatantly unconstitutional 1934 and 1968 gun control acts
36 posted on 02/02/2005 4:25:23 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
repealing the blatantly unconstitutional 1934 and 1968 gun control acts

What about GC '86 that banned new machine guns? I'd like to see that repealed first.

37 posted on 02/02/2005 5:51:14 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
What about GC '86 that banned new machine guns? I'd like to see that repealed first.

Thanks for reminding me about 86 I had totally forgotten about that that also needs to go bye bye.Hopefully the same day 1934 and 1968 acts get repealed we wil lhave to wait for a republican president that does not pander to the sarah brady crowd by sayinghe will sign the assault weapons ban if it gets to his desk though

38 posted on 02/02/2005 6:26:49 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
republican president that does not pander to the sarah brady crowd by sayinghe will sign the assault weapons ban if it gets to his desk though

Bush isn't just saying it; he will sign it if it gets to his desk. He is not conservative on the gun issue - more of a moderate (moderate defined as a patient liberal) as opposed to a flaming liberal like Clinton (either Clinton).

39 posted on 02/02/2005 6:33:23 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Exactly. I'd like to see Michael Moron, Rosie O'Donnell, and the rest of the liberal idiots take up residence in one of the former three. Of course, they'd have to leave their armed bodyguards behind, but wouldn't it be worth it knowing that no other law-abiding citizen had the right to defend himself either?

As for NYC, I live here, so I hope we come to our senses. But I won't hold my breath.


40 posted on 02/02/2005 6:43:54 AM PST by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson