This is the image From:
http://www.qo4.net/montda/uploads/post-4-1107268656.jpg
Mirrored loacally to load faster:
Does anyone know where qo4.net is ?
My copy of NeoTrace Pro traces www.qo4.net to the city of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Registrant:
moh shahab
dammam
dammam 966
Saudi Arabia
Registered through: GoDaddy.com (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: ALMJLAH.NET
Created on: 28-Jun-04
Expires on: 28-Jun-05
Last Updated on: 29-Jun-04
Administrative Contact:
shahab, moh info@dammamhost.com
dammam
dammam 966
Saudi Arabia
508977789
Technical Contact:
shahab, moh info@dammamhost.com
dammam
dammam 966
Saudi Arabia
508977789
New Terror Website www.ansarnet.ws Registered to a Dallas Address
Also Evan Kohlman of Global Terroralert was just on MSNBC and stated that whoever staged and posted the capture of the GI Cody was definitely not islamic. Kohlman said that the writing on the black flag hanging behind the doll was probably traced and was evidence that whoever did it was not familiar with the islamic language.
Alleged Photo of U.S. Soldier Held in Iraq Appears to be a Hoax
Update: I will be a guest on Countdown with Keith Olbermann on MSNBC at 8:15PM EST tonight to discuss the apparent hostage photo hoax.
The mainstream media has jumped on the purported story of "John Adam" -- a U.S. soldier allegedly taken prisoner by a little known Iraqi insurgent group known as the "Mujahideen Squadrons." A quick analysis of the photo released of "John Adam" shows that it is likely just a hoax:
1.) The soldier is seen seated in front of the trademark rising sun banner of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's Al-Qaida faction in Iraq. Yet, this was not the group that took credit for the kidnapping. In fact, no credible representative from Zarqawi's group has yet taken credit for this kidnapping. The albeit-blurry words inscribed on the banner seem to be poorly written--perhaps suggesting that they were conceived by someone who is only a novice in the Arabic language.
2.) As pointed out by several colleagues, the boots and uniform worn by "John Adam" are not standard U.S. military issue. The name patch on his uniform, which should read ADAM, isn't visible either.
3.) The photo itself shows obvious signs of having been sloppily edited. "John's" face is marked by jagged, digital features and a chin line that is distinctly non-human. Notice that the left side of his chin runs in varying, contrasting sizes, demarcated by precise perpendicular lines. See image below: