I have heard that the next issue of Time is full of all sorts of lies. As if that is anything new.
I was wondering where that 500K number came from. Thanks for posting this CP--it's good to revisit the left's lies to keep them fresh in everyone's minds.
"Doctors say hospitals were forced to keep the bodies of babies who had died prematurely or of natural causes for up to two months until Saddam had enough to stage a parade of the little corpses, with women bussed in to act as "mourners", screaming insults at the US in front of television cameras"
When I first read this..I realized the camera is a tyrant's best friend in many cases.
bump
Thanks, Pete. This bears repeating. Saddam set us up on this, but he could not have done so without so many willing accomplices who are on "our side." Fisk and Pilger are so blatently dishonest they should never be listened to again.
Thanks for the repost. I don't think I saw this in June '03.
Ward.Churchill@Colorado.EDU
Office: 303-492-8852
According to the story I read from the CU student newspaper, the REGENTS ARE WANTING PUBLIC INPUT! CONTACT THEM HERE:
Jerryrutledge@adelphia.net (the chair)
Tommyjclay@aol.com
Peter.Steinhauer@colorado.edu
Regent.Carlisle@colorado.edu
Regent.Hayes@colorado.edu
Carrigan@colorado.edu
Regent.Bosley@colorado.edu
Regent.Schauer@colorado.edu
Gail.Schwartz@colorado.edu
University of Colorado Dept. of Ethnic Studies:
Fax: 303-492-7799
"I have never said that people 'should' engage in armed attacks on the United States, but that such attacks are a natural and unavoidable consequence of unlawful U.S. policy. As Martin Luther King, quoting Robert F. Kennedy, said, 'Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.'"
Look you stupid idiot: When you say we are to blame for the attack, you may not be saying you support the terrorists. But, you can't talk about us as if we are guilty and actually expect people to support you. There is only a minor distinction, not a major difference between you supporting the terrorists and just saying we are partially to blame. After all, by saying we are partially to blame due to our policies, you are expressing sympathy for the terrorists and partially validating their actions.
I e-mailed him this.....I was much more tactful in my e-mail:
"Sir,
I am appalled by what you have said regarding 9/11.
I also read your statement on your site. I believe that every story has two sides.
However, when I read your response, it was less than convincing. Your word choice was very poor in your piece. And frankly, based on your previous writings, on marxism and the like, I wonder just how much sympathy you actually do give to the terrorists, contrary to your protestations.
There is no major difference, only a difference in slight distinction, between actually supporting the terrorists and giving their actions legitimacy by attacking the victims of their attacks and saying the policy of the United States brought the attacks on itself.
You do not seem to understand this. I have called your college and demanded you be fired immediately."