Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phenn; dirtboy; pc93; FR_addict
Dirtboy is correct. This is a state issue, not federal.

However, is the law allowing euthansia retroactive? As I recall, Terri was injured quite a few years before the law was legalized. Michael said many things in a court of law in the malpractice trial, then changed his mind once the law was enacted. On t.v., he has publicly said that he doesn't like his father-in-law and that's the reason he won't give in and let the family care for her.

Judge Greer, yoo hoo.

1,782 posted on 02/17/2005 8:28:42 PM PST by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1763 | View Replies ]


To: lakey

"On t.v., he has publicly said that he (Michael) doesn't like his father-in-law and that's the reason he won't give in and let the family care for her."

Wow!! It sounds like on top of everything else, Michael is REVENGEFUL.

If he said right on tv that "that's the reason," it seems that the tv clip of Michael saying that should be presented in a Court of Law.


1,788 posted on 02/17/2005 8:39:27 PM PST by Sun (Visit www.theEmpireJournal.com * Pray for Terri. Pray to end abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1782 | View Replies ]

To: lakey

Florida does not have a law (yet) permitting euthanasia, voluntary or otherwise. This case is setting precedent for just that sort of thing.


1,789 posted on 02/17/2005 8:40:17 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1782 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson