Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thechoosenone

"hate to break it to you, but terry has been dead for a long time. Let her rest in peace. We all have to let a loved one go. Once your married it should be the husbands decision, not the parents."

Not when the husband has other motives for wanting to see Terri dead!

He is her husband-in-name-only. He more than like is responsible for her condition in the first place. He said he would spend her jury award on her rehabilitation, but refused to allow Terri to get any rehabilitation after winning the case. He lives and has children with another woman who he intends to marry as soon as he succeeds in killing Terri.

There is sworn testimony from a girlfriend that Terri had indicated she did not agree with the decision on Karen Quinlan. If I remember right, Terri said "Where there's life, there's hope."

There is sworn testimony from nurses that he abused Terri. Some of these nurses lost their jobs because they testified against the husband. No one owns another human being. The husband has not followed the duties of a guardian in the state of Florida.

Shouldn't the state of Florida enforce its own laws and appoint another guardian?


167 posted on 02/02/2005 11:50:35 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: FR_addict
it is outragoues how Florida has deliberately broken its own laws in the Terri Schiavo case. From all that has been posted here, Gov. Bush has the power to save Terri's life.

This case has far reaching implications. Among others, it demonstrates how laws are violated merely on the whim of the powerful, with judges having the power of little dictators.

179 posted on 02/02/2005 2:56:12 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson