Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Judge: Guantanamo Suspects Have Rights
Yahoo ^ | 01/31/2005 | James Vicini

Posted on 01/31/2005 9:36:17 AM PST by Hawk44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: appalachian_dweller

That was rather harsh. Perhaps you forgot the smiley tag at the end?


21 posted on 01/31/2005 9:50:23 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

If you do some research on her, she really isn't anti-American at all. Don't worry, it'll get up to the Supreme Court - then you can worry.


22 posted on 01/31/2005 9:51:54 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

She never worked for Carter, never knew him. She doesn't know who suggested she be appointed. Let's try to be fair here.


23 posted on 01/31/2005 9:52:46 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Idisarthur
"But I often hear - "we need to be persuasive, cogent and appealing". I also often hear "Ann Coulter is too harsh".

Where do you hear this. On DU?

24 posted on 01/31/2005 9:52:47 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

The detainees have rights, of course. But those rights are not the same as conferred upon a US citizen as a birthright. They are much more circumscribed. For instance, there is no right to speedy trial, or even any trial at all. Failure to identify their personal relationship with the recognized authority of another country, whether as a citizen or as a legal resident, tends to place them in the status of a stateless person, and there is no provision for repatriating them anywhere. However, it is obvious that they have a certain degree of animus toward the US, and it is against public order to permit them freedom in the absence of any assurance they have recanted their earlier belligerence.

I suppose we should not apply physically painful inpositions upon them, in an attempt to get them to confess, especially to something that was basically untrue, or starve them, or deny at least some respite from uncomfortable conditions.


25 posted on 01/31/2005 9:52:54 AM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Making fun of people is DUish, IMO.


26 posted on 01/31/2005 9:53:42 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
Toss the shrew in with 'em.


27 posted on 01/31/2005 9:54:32 AM PST by Viking2002 (Let's get the Insurrection started, already..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Gee I didn't know there was a "Bill of Rights" for un-uniformed, non American terrorist killers captured bearing arms against and killing American soldiers.

Who hide among civilians and wait for the appropriate time to kill as many as possible. They abide by no rules of war and represent no country or government.

I would gladly go to a class if this idiot judge can show me the phrases of The Constitution which grant these rights. After all her oath of office says she will defend the Constitution against all enemies, both domestic and foreign.

Opps! I guess that means her, seems she will have to resign to honor her oath of office. She is the enemy.


28 posted on 01/31/2005 9:54:44 AM PST by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000

Just got word that a FReeper friend of mine's son lost a buddy in Iraq. I get very angry at these liberal know-it-alls who're not fit to lick a soldier's boots.


29 posted on 01/31/2005 9:55:32 AM PST by appalachian_dweller (Freedom is not free. Freedom's currency is blood. Freedom is worth it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

I stand corrected.


30 posted on 01/31/2005 9:59:00 AM PST by HMFIC (The Peace Symbol is the FOOTPRINT of the American CHICKEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

""In sum, there can be no question that the Fifth Amendment right asserted by the Guantanamo detainees in this litigation -- the right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law -- is one of the most fundamental rights recognized by the U.S. Constitution," she said. "

I'm not a lawyer, however, this does not prevent me from declaring her a dumb twit.

The prisoners are not citizens. They were captured on a field of battle. They were not fighting for a recognized government or in a uniform (per Geneva). Thus, they are not even guaranteed Convention treatment, let alone constitutional treatment.

Moreover, as 1 post had it - jurisdiction. I am not certain she has authority to rule.

As Andy Jackson said, "the court has ruled, not let them enforce it!"


31 posted on 01/31/2005 10:00:00 AM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HMFIC

You forgot panties on the head (a fate worse than death!)


32 posted on 01/31/2005 10:00:06 AM PST by rockrr (Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boofus
Do US constitutional rights apply to foreign and stateless, criminals...criminals apprehended with weapons in hand and who challenge US uniformed personnel?
33 posted on 01/31/2005 10:00:56 AM PST by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus to his sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Certainly they have rights. They had the right to decide to attack and kill Iraqis and American troops and to attempt to destabilize any effort to bring peace to Iraq. They could have chosen to side with freedom and would not have found themselves in prison in Cuba. They had rights, they exercised those rights and in the process of doing so waived other rights.


34 posted on 01/31/2005 10:01:05 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"If you do some research on her, she really isn't anti-American at all. Don't worry, it'll get up to the Supreme Court - then you can worry"

I think you addressed that to the wrong person? LOL
I have no idea of whom you are speaking about? LOL


35 posted on 01/31/2005 10:01:20 AM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
Green also ruled that some of the suspects have brought valid claims under the Geneva Convention, the international treaty protecting the rights of prisoners of war.

These scum cannot apply to the Geneva Convention....they are terrorists. Judge Green's attempted legislation from the bench will fail.

This is a sure winner on appeal.

36 posted on 01/31/2005 10:01:24 AM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
There is a quote from the outlaw josey wales that should be applied to the gitmo terrors, and I don't mean the one about a Missouri boat ride.
37 posted on 01/31/2005 10:03:31 AM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

So is this judge - Joyce Hens Green - saying that everyone on this earth is entitled to the protections of the United States Constitution? I'm sure this will be overturned.


38 posted on 01/31/2005 10:03:37 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
This judge is sticking her thumb in the eye of the US Supreme Court. That Court ruled unanimously in 1942 that the Law of War, as adopted by the Congress and as recognized by the Constitution, allowed such detention, and trials, and executions if the defendants were found guilty.

The case which this judge spits on, is In re Quirin. Since later Supreme Court decisions have confirmed that Quirin is good law, this wrong and false decision WILL be slapped down on appeal. Unfortunately, there is no way also to slap down the judge herself.

Congressman Billybob [TWO different columns this week]

Click for latest, "Homer, Shakespeare, Pope, and George Bush"

Click for latest, "Dusty Rhodes, a Death in the Family"

39 posted on 01/31/2005 10:03:57 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
Judge Green was appointed United States District Judge for the District of Columbia in May 1979. She was a member of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court from May 1988 until her seven-year term expired in May 1995, and served as its Presiding Judge from May 1990 until the expiration of her term. Judge Green graduated from the University of Maryland, receiving a B.A. in 1949, and the George Washington University Law School, receiving a J.D. in 1951. Judge Green practiced law in the District of Columbia and Virginia until she was appointed Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in 1968, where she served until her appointment to the federal bench in 1979. She is a member of the U.S. Judicial Conference’s Judicial Branch Committee and Chair (1997 - 98), National Conference of Federal Trial Judges. Judge Green took senior status in July 1995.

Carter appointee.....

40 posted on 01/31/2005 10:05:56 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson