To: bmweezer
I'm cool to the NRST. A flat tax would be much better. Ten or 15 percent across the board and that's that.
18 posted on
01/31/2005 7:22:53 AM PST by
rdb3
(The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
To: rdb3; Poohbah
Agreed. Espescially with the 16th Amendment in the picture. Wanna bet that we could end up with the worst of both worlds otherwise?
47 posted on
01/31/2005 7:36:01 AM PST by
hchutch
(A pro-artificial turf, pro-designated hitter baseball fan.)
To: rdb3
I'm cool to the NRST. A flat tax would be much better. Ten or 15 percent across the board and that's that. There is one reason I prefer the NRST to a flat tax. Under a flat tax I still have to report to the government how much I earn every year. As far as I am concerned, that's nobody's business but my own.
Under the NRST I don't report to the government a thing. Retailers report their retail sales in taxable items. That's it. No personal information is collected by the feds on my spending habits or my income or anything.
I gotta love that.
Shalom.
73 posted on
01/31/2005 7:47:33 AM PST by
ArGee
(After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
To: rdb3
That is how the income tax started out, look where we ended up.
651 posted on
01/31/2005 1:35:04 PM PST by
looscnnn
("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson