Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry pins loss on Sept. 11
New York Daily News ^ | 1/31/05 | HELEN KENNEDY

Posted on 01/31/2005 1:24:09 AM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON - Capping his week-long return to the spotlight, a defensive John Kerry appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press" yesterday to explain his election loss - and was hit with yet more questions about Vietnam.

Kerry ultimately chalked up the results to 9/11, saying it was hard for people to forsake their President after such a national trauma.

But host Tim Russert's lengthy grilling about details of a mission on the Cambodian border 36 years ago showed how well Kerry's opponents undercut his valorous record, and how badly Kerry fought back.

"I believe that 9/11 was the central deciding issue in this race," Kerry said. President Bush "obviously connected to the American people in those immediate days. When a country is at war and in the wake of 9/11, it's very difficult to shift horses."

He said a videotape of Osama Bin Laden that appeared days before the election may have sunk him. "We were rising in the polls up until the last day when the tape appeared," Kerry said.

But he noted he came within 60,000 votes of the White House, raised more money and got more votes than any Democrat before him.

Russert spent a good part of the interview asking if Kerry would release every item in his military record, which Bush has never done, and reading a Daily News editorial questioning Kerry's account of spending Christmas 1968 in Cambodia. Kerry said he was in Cambodia but not that night. "It was on another day. I jumbled the two together," he said.

The Massachusetts senator has made little effort to hide his expectation to run again in 2008, and he has the money - about $20 million left over - the organization and the name recognition needed.

However, many Democrats are still baffled at how a candidate with so much money and such a united party could lose against a relatively unpopular President who sent the nation to war for weapons that didn't exist. The loss must be Kerry's fault, they think.

"Lenny Wilkens has a better chance of coming back as the Knicks coach," sniffed a top Democratic strategist with no love for Kerry.

Billionaire George Soros, who spent $26 million on anti-Bush efforts, also blamed Kerry, telling Bloomberg News yesterday, "Kerry did not, actually, offer a credible and coherent alternative."

Experts say Kerry shouldn't be counted out. "There are only about 25 people in the country who can look in the mirror and credibly say they could be President, and Kerry is one of them," said Stephen Hess, senior presidential scholar at the Brookings Institution.

Originally published on January 31, 2005



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kerrydefeat; mtp; whykerrylost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2005 1:24:09 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
But he noted he came within 60,000 votes of the White House

Huh? he lost Ohio by over 100,000 alone.
2 posted on 01/31/2005 1:28:05 AM PST by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"There are only about 25 people in the country who can look in the mirror and credibly say they could be President, and Kerry is one of them," said Stephen Hess, senior presidential scholar at the Brookings Institution.

Like Algore, right? He's one of those 25 people who can look in the mirror and credibly say they could be President. I don't know where Stephen Hess knows 25 people like that but its all a bunch of cow manure. Jean Francois Cheri doesn't have the personality, let alone the gravitas, to be President. He still LOST. Liberals will never get it!

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

3 posted on 01/31/2005 1:30:04 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

<< .... he noted he came within 60,000 votes of the White House .... >>

Or ten million, if the 6-7 million fraudulent votes counted for him are subtracted and their number added to the three million everyone else counted him missing it by.


4 posted on 01/31/2005 1:32:12 AM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Adua Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
Yeah... if Bush had carried New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan - Jean Francois still wouldn't be President even if he had won Ohio. Two can play this "What If" fantasy.

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

5 posted on 01/31/2005 1:32:23 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
I am getting so damned f**king ('scuse the language but it's the only term that expresses how steamed I am) tired about hearing about this "only," "just," etc. 60,000 votes crap. All I have to say to that is--well, if not for 7,000 votes in WI or 5,000 votes in NH, OH could have gone to Kerry by 100% and it wouldn't matter. So there. Hah.

And I find it absolutely hilarious how the dems have done a total about-face--they are only concentrating on the electoral vote (if Kerry had prevailed) when I thought they cared SO MUCH about only the popular vote.

6 posted on 01/31/2005 1:39:44 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

3.7 million - is what he lost by - not 60,000


7 posted on 01/31/2005 1:40:11 AM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Kerry is increasingly like the ex-wife or ex-husband from hell that just won't go away.


8 posted on 01/31/2005 1:40:40 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
If you subtract 60,000 (or so) votes from Bush in Ohio and give them to Kerry, Kerry wins.

But let's not contemplate such a doomsday scenario, okay? It's too early in the morning.

9 posted on 01/31/2005 1:40:56 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

No, it wasn't 9/11 Senator Waffle, it was the fact that the American people wised up to the fact that YOU ARE A PUTZ!!!

Now refund the salary for the job you never showed up for over the last year or so, stuff your f'in piehole with a Philly cheese-steak (with SWISS cheese of course), and tell your fellow Bay State Senator that fat, drunk and stupid is NO way to go through life.

And HEY! Count your blessings Jean Francois, at least TerRAYzah isn't FAT, right?


10 posted on 01/31/2005 1:41:34 AM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The Democrats tried but failed to come up with the missing votes to take OH. And they're still obssessed about it in their sleep. NYAH, NYAH, NYAH, NYAH! Would, could, shmould. So?

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

11 posted on 01/31/2005 1:50:42 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yeah, Kerry can't let it go...what he took to be his rightful ascendancy to the Presidency was snatched away from him. He'll whine about it until he dies.


12 posted on 01/31/2005 1:54:39 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
60,000?? In his dreams. More like over 6 MILLION.
13 posted on 01/31/2005 1:58:11 AM PST by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Kerry will say anything to hide the fact he was a bad campaigner.
1. you cant win with hate.
2. you cant win with lies
3.when you make claims of war records , be prepared to show them
4. when you have a nasty wife with a foul mouth keep her hidden
5. people are not born to be President. Especially Mass. pussies who never worked a day in their lives.


14 posted on 01/31/2005 2:00:50 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Kerry should pin loss on his lying.......


15 posted on 01/31/2005 2:22:34 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Russert spent a good part of the interview asking if Kerry would release every item in his military record, which Bush has never done

This tells you how smart Helen Kennedy is, Bush released his record its Kerry who never did.

How do stupid peoplr like these keep thier jobs?

16 posted on 01/31/2005 2:23:43 AM PST by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

John Kerry and Ted Kennedy are traitors, and should be treated accordingly!!!


17 posted on 01/31/2005 2:26:33 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

agree....the twin idiot traitors of massofupchuck.


18 posted on 01/31/2005 2:34:38 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
He said a videotape of Osama Bin Laden that appeared days before the election may have sunk him. "We were rising in the polls up until the last day when the tape appeared," Kerry said.

What sunk him was being a fraud and a liar. When this tape came out, THE LIAR and FRIENDS claimed it would not effect them and was actually bad for Bush. THEY LIED! THEY KNEW THEY WERE LYING! ENOUGH AMERICANS KNEW HIM AND HIS CAMPAIGN WAS A LIE!

19 posted on 01/31/2005 2:36:33 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Kerry had the same myopic dementia as a Naval Officer --so
it appears. The delusions of Grandeur in his fostering the
notion that he was the "next JFK from Mass. " seems sure
sign of dementia.It was not 9-11-01 that defeated Kerry but his moral and mental confusion about 1968 and his play
acting as the image of a man he never was.


20 posted on 01/31/2005 2:38:17 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson