Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Willie Green

In 1783, the term "well-regulated" meant efficient and ordered - it had nothing to do with government oversight.


2 posted on 01/30/2005 11:12:56 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fenris6

To put it another way, We the People are the regulators, not the regulatees.


9 posted on 01/30/2005 11:17:55 AM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Fenris6
In 1783, the term "well-regulated" meant efficient and ordered - it had nothing to do with government oversight.

Sort of, but, no.

"Well regulated" means a state [not Fed] is to have regulations for their militia. Primarily at that time it was to set up a chain of command for communication. You didn't just get on the phone and call the governor if the militia was needed.

The system for a militia, defined by regulations passed by the legislature, insured prompt response to threats, disasters, and other needs. It was also to make sure there were enough people in place to handle the needs of the state. (ie: state tried to make sure everybody didn't just live in a few areas, but rather able men lived in outlying areas as well.)

Sarah Brady's opinion of the laws during that period do not reflect the real laws nor reality itself. The regulations put in place called for men to have weapons and ammo.

Never did 'well regulated' mean gun control or the oppression of liberty to own and possess a weapon for use in a militia [which, yes, is military style weapons].
22 posted on 01/30/2005 11:35:24 AM PST by Griptilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson