Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Official: 'Washington Examiner' to Debut in D.C. on Feb. 1
Editor & Publisher ^ | January 12, 2005 | None cited

Posted on 01/30/2005 8:48:22 AM PST by sitetest

DENVER (AP) A media company owned by billionaire investor Philip Anschutz said Wednesday it will launch a free, six-day-a-week newspaper in the Washington, D.C., area on Feb. 1.

The Washington Examiner, a tabloid, will replace three suburban newspapers that Anschutz's Clarity Media Group, bought from Journal Newspapers Inc. last year for an undisclosed sum.

The Examiner will be published Sunday through Friday and will tailor some news and opinion pages for residents in the District, suburban Maryland, and northern Virginia.

The company said home delivery will also be available in parts of Washington, a rarity for a free newspaper in a big media market. It is planning an initial daily circulation of about 260,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: anschutz; billionaires; newspaper; newspapers; philipanschutz; postcompetition; washington; washingtonexaminer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
This is a very interesting development for those of us who live in the Washington, DC region.

What do folks know about this? A quick search of topics at FR reveals the owner is possibly a conservative Republican?

Is this an attempt to add a widely-read and truly conservative voice to the Washington, and national media?

sitetest

1 posted on 01/30/2005 8:48:22 AM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

This is some news that I think may be of interest to Washington area folks. Could you ping some folks to this?

Thank you.


2 posted on 01/30/2005 8:49:47 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

This looked to me like an interesting story for Washington area folks. If you wouldn't mind pinging a few folks, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.


3 posted on 01/30/2005 8:57:26 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

"... it will launch a free, six-day-a-week newspaper..."

You get what you pay for.


4 posted on 01/30/2005 8:57:26 AM PST by MisterRepublican (Liberalism kills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Dear MisterRepublican.

One hopes that one gets at least what one pays for.

In this case, if the owner has an agenda, one might get something more.


sitetest
5 posted on 01/30/2005 8:58:34 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1306757/posts

A related thread from December.


6 posted on 01/30/2005 9:05:28 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Does anybody know if this Anschutz guy is from the same family who tried to run the livestock business out of Colorado?


7 posted on 01/30/2005 9:23:44 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I'm totally out of the loop on this story. It looks like he bought the Journal Newspapers (Montgomery, Prince George, and their Northern Virginia cousin). The Examiner has a help wanted ad for sales professionals in the Sunday edition of the Journal Online (page 13). I'll be looking for the print edition around town on Tuesday.
8 posted on 01/30/2005 9:25:28 AM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillF; kristinn; Jimmy Valentine's brother; BufordP; sinanju; Christopher Lincoln; rabidralph; ...
Pinging some local folks...
9 posted on 01/30/2005 9:30:39 AM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

Dear tgslTakoma,

Thanks.

I listen to WGMS, and have heard ads for this newspaper for the last week or two, and kept thinking to try to google on it. The article above is one of the results therefrom.

I live in Anne Arundel County, so I doubt I'm going to be one of the folks who gets home delivery, but I will be on the look-out for it in places like 7-11.


sitetest


10 posted on 01/30/2005 9:56:28 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

A quick search of topics at FR reveals the owner is possibly a conservative Republican?

God I hope so!! I'd like to see more fair and balanced news in print-and free to boot. Cool!


11 posted on 01/30/2005 9:59:32 AM PST by gimme1ibertee (A liberal is a mental case is a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

I was wondering if maybe he was the same Anschutz of "Anschutz rifle" fame.


12 posted on 01/30/2005 10:00:55 AM PST by gimme1ibertee (A liberal is a mental case is a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

Dear gimmetlibertee,

Here is an interesting story on Mr. Anschutz:

http://getreligion.typepad.com/getreligion/2004/11/who_is_philip_a.html

Apparently, he is a conservative Republican and an evangelical Christian.

From this, may I deduce that he is not a "country club" primarily fiscal conservative Republican, but rather a social conservative?


sitetest


13 posted on 01/30/2005 10:05:06 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz


14 posted on 01/30/2005 10:05:37 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Thank you for that bio. He is of the same family who attempted to chase the livestock industry out of Colorado. It seems he purchased some land in the mountains for a retreat,, then decided the rancher who'd been there forever shouldn't feed livestock.

Common sense says whoever was there first has first rights. And if you want to control the land across the fence you'd derned best buy it.

City folks,,, especially city folks with money, seldom understand this philosophy. It doesn't matter what their political affiliation is. They think they can buy everything they want.

He was successful in spearheading dramatic changes to Colorado livestock regulations, but failed in his attempt to drive them out completely. Of course he denied wanting to drive them out completely, but the regs he was supporting would have done exactly that.


15 posted on 01/30/2005 10:18:01 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I found the info in post # 14 equally informative.Thanks.


16 posted on 01/30/2005 10:21:57 AM PST by gimme1ibertee (A liberal is a mental case is a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

He must not know that feeding livestock produces great natural fertilizer.


17 posted on 01/30/2005 10:30:23 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

Hays, Kansas is "city folks?"


18 posted on 01/30/2005 10:38:53 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

Dear Iowa Granny,

I was hoping to focus more on the new newspaper and the politics that might possibly lie behind it.

However, in googling on the subject you mention, I'll note that he wasn't trying to "drive livestock business out of Colorado." He had a dispute with a neighbor who was a hog farmer, and got involved in the politics of hog farming. The legislation that he backed in Colorado was opposed by large hog farming operations, but endorsed by others, including "traditional farmers," according to this link:

http://www.denver-rmn.com/extra/campaign/news/1104hogs.shtml

As well, folks who sold stuff to hog farmers also were against the legislation. But when put to a vote in referendum, it passed.

Here, apparently, was the nexus of the problem:

"Unlike cattle feedlots, where manure is solid and can be trucked away, hog farms use large lagoons to hold manure washed from barns. Neighbors have complained about the smell and worry about leaks into their water wells."

The new legislation approved at referendum required, "the state will have to add waste management and odor control rules and hire a staff to inspect the hog farms."

For the record, another intiative appeared on the ballot at the same time that would have increased regulation of ALL livestock enterprises, but Mr. Anschutz supported, with a $100,000 donation, the one that only increased regulation of hog farming.

Finally, as to being "city folk," he was born in Great Bend, KS, which as of 2000, had a population of about 15,000 souls. He grew up in another major metropolis, Hays, KS, 2000 population of about 20,000.

He started out in that typical urban profession of oil drilling, and made his first fortune there. Here is a quote from a Washington Post profile from November, 2004:

"Anschutz first struck it rich in the oil fields of Wyoming and Utah and then proceeded to sink his wealth into a variety of investments."

Yep, he sure is a real city slicker. (Link to article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A808-2004Nov20.html )


sitetest


19 posted on 01/30/2005 10:52:14 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

spin it any way you want to. He certainly was not living in Hays Ks in a 3 room bungalow when he took on the livestock industry.

And anyone who thinks that cattle feedlots do not drain runoff after a rain is delusional.

Regulations on livestock should apply to ALL species. Anything otherwise is simply supported for political reasons.


20 posted on 01/30/2005 11:22:55 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson