Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Methamphetamine Scourge Sweeps Rural America
Reuters (via Yahoo) ^ | Jan 29. 2005 | Alan Elsner

Posted on 01/29/2005 10:32:26 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Imagine that, with $100 worth of supplies bought from neighborhood stores, dealers could easily cook up $1,000 worth of a drug so addictive that users quickly descend into a hell of violence, crime and neglect.

That frightening scenario is the reality of methamphetamine, a drug that is sweeping rural America, spawning crime, child abuse and toxic pollution and ripping apart communities.

"It is out of control. It is a huge problem all across the United States," said Mike Logsdon, unit chief of an intelligence arm of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that collects data on the problem.

The drug, also known as crank, crystal, speed and ice, can be snorted, injected, smoked or swallowed. Within minutes, the user experiences a rush of energy and sense of well-being that can last up to 12 hours. But when it wears off, it leaves a feeling of deep depression and paranoia which makes the user desperate for another dose.

The scourge has taken hold in the last five years, and rural areas are bearing the brunt of the problem. Experts say that is primarily because meth is easy and cheap to make. Ingredients include readily accessible rock salt, battery acid, anhydrous ammonia and cold medicines. Recipes can be downloaded from the Internet.

As well, wide-open spaces in the country and small towns offer plentiful places to hide the drug activity.

"It's the first drug in the history of the United States we can make, distribute, sell, take, all here in the Midwest," said Detective Jason Grellner, of the Franklin County Sheriff's Department in Missouri, who seized 120 meth labs last year.

"You can't grow a coca plantation or an opium plantation here to get your heroin or cocaine, and marijuana takes four or five months to grow a good plant. With methamphetamine you can go out and for a couple hundred dollars you can make your drugs that day," Grellner said.

SWIFT AND SERIOUS

The problem descended on rural America with shocking suddenness. Sheriff Randy Krukow of Clay County in western Iowa said that in 1999, he had detected not a single meth-producing laboratory. By 2001, his force had broken up 56 in a county with a population of only 18,000.

For the fiscal year ending September 2004, the Drug Enforcement Administration counted more than 16,800 methamphetamine-related seizures by law enforcement across the country, up from 15,300 in 2002.

"This is the most serious law enforcement problem we've ever faced in the history of our state because this substance is so addictive and so easy and cheap to make," said North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem.

"When we look at our prison population, 10 years ago nobody had even heard of it. Now 60 percent of our male inmates are users and we're building a brand new prison for female users," Stenehjem said.

Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal recently told a statewide conference on combating the drug: "It doesn't matter where we go in the state, methamphetamine is there. The whole issue is eating us alive."

According to the Drug Trends Analysis Unit, an office in the Department of Justice, the highest numbers of meth labs are found in California, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri, all important farming states.

Clandestine labs were discovered in abandoned farms, in fields and ditches, vehicles, barns and even in 309 cases in hotel rooms. In one 2002 incident in North Dakota, an explosion set off a fire which destroyed the entire hotel.

In thousands of cases, people have been caught cooking the highly toxic chemicals in homes where children were present, breathing the poisonous fumes.

'SUPER LABS'

But these small mobile labs only scratch the surface of the problem. According to the Drug Enforcement Administration, 80 percent of the methamphetamine sold in the United States is produced in so-called 'super labs' in Mexico or California run by organized crime syndicates which cook up vast quantities.

"The wholesale abuse of the drug is serious enough. But when we factor is the toxic environmental effects from unregulated chemicals used in clandestine laboratories, we see that methamphetamine is taking a terrible toll. No community is immune," Joseph Rannazzisi, deputy chief of enforcement for the DEA told a congressional committee in November.

Each pound of methamphetamines produced yields another five to six pounds of toxic waste. Cleanup after labs are discovered can cost thousands of dollars apiece and can endanger the lives of police officers who lack the expertise required.

In an effort to stem meth production, at least 20 states are now trying to limit the amount of cold medicines and decongestants they will sell to individuals to two packets at any one time. Some states are requiring stores to take them off the shelves entirely.

In future, shoppers will have to ask a pharmacist for them directly. The measures are being vigorously opposed by the pharmaceutical industry.

Faced with a growing number of addicts, few rural communities have treatment facilities or funds to create them.

The National Institute of Drug Abuse is funding clinical trials in five U.S. cities in California, Hawaii and Missouri, hoping to find chemical and behavioral therapies to free users from their addictions.

Meth's economic costs can be significant as well. A study issued last month by the Sam Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas studied methamphetamine use in Benton County, the home of retailing giant Walmart Stores Inc. The survey found that lost productivity and absenteeism because of methamphetamine addiction was costing employers there more than $21 million a year.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: addiction; bigbrother; billofrights; clintonlegacy; idiotdopeheads; meth; pseudephedrine; rural; substanceabuse; sudafed; thankyoulibertarians; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-250 next last
To: datura
Ask some of our combat pilots or Rangers about the meth they're ISSUED. But that's OK, since they are administered their doses by a doctor, right?

Yeah, that is OK.....

Death to tweekers.

181 posted on 01/31/2005 1:15:17 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Its been rampant in KC for at least 6 years now.


182 posted on 01/31/2005 1:20:53 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TruBluKentuckian
my own comment on this, is the hollowing out of the US manufacturing and industrial jobs base is helping lead to this.

I disagree. I live in a comparatively wealthy county in Wyoming. We have very, very high employment here, with mining, gas and oil jobs that start at $19/hr, entry level, no experience, no diploma. Experienced workers routinely earn in the six-figures in a year, with overtime. All this, and meth use is absolutely exploding here. These well-paid workers are sucking this stuff up as quickly as anyone.

The fact is, the drug is the problem!! There are no underlying socio-economic causes at work. A recent speaker at our company is a recovering meth user/dealer. He answered this exact question by telling us he sold to people from every economic level, every race, every industry. He sold to kids, teachers, miners, roughnecks, waitresses, students... It is one of the most addictive drugs ever created.

183 posted on 01/31/2005 1:33:13 PM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: TChris

"Many meth users are ingenious and determined in their techniques to avoid detection."


Don't forget there are also easily purchased digestable products to cover or disguise certain drugs like pot in a persons system. Not sure what they are since I'm not into the druggie scene (Proud Prude, Thank you very much). Only heard about this through employers and employees while discussing the drug problem in the work place.


184 posted on 01/31/2005 1:40:44 PM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
"Diane Finestein sponsored that bill in California. Now all we have to do is outlaw salt, battery acid, ammonia and the other 487 products in the drug and grocery stores that can be used to manufacture this product."

I disagree with a lot of our drug policy decisions in this country but putting the psuedoephedrine behind the counters in pharmacies is a good idea. The number of meth labs in Oklahoma has dropped something like 75% or 80% since they passed their laws, and the inconvenience to consumers is minimal.

Would we need to "outlaw salt, battery acid, ammonia and the other 487 products in the drug and grocery stores that can be used to manufacture this product?" Of course not. We don't even need to outlaw psuedoephedrine. All we need to do is make it such that it isn't so easy to hit every gas station, convenience store, grocery store, and so on in town and buy the limit or steal it off the shelves. And the fact is, and get this because it's important, psuedoehedrine is the substance that is converted into meth. These other substances from local stores are chemicals that can be used to help in the conversion of psuedephedrine into meth. There are several different methods for accomplishing this conversion that use various common chemicals. You could ban one chemical and another could be substituted in its place or they could just use a different "recipe." The one thing they have to have is psuedoephedrine. There are a few other things that can be converted into meth, but they are already controlled and/or too expensive for use in little kitchen meth labs. Without ready access to large amounts of psuedoephedrine most of the little kitchen meth labs would disappear.

Increasing penalties for those caught with little kitchen meth labs and ramping up law enforcement efforts is not going to substantially reduce the numbers of these little labs. The only thing that is showing real promise are laws similar to those passed in Oklahoma. All states should take a close look at what they've been able to do.
185 posted on 01/31/2005 1:55:07 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

I didn't say I was surprised by the prison culture. I said it's a travesty that U.S. prisons in the 21st century are still as they are. I admittedly know less than zero about running prisons, but I have to believe it's possible to change the inside culture from its current state, a state that breeds more hardened criminals.

I'll revert to my original point: Reinstitute mandatory work for every able-bodied inmate. First, inmates shouldn't be able to live on the taxpayer dole and do nothing. Second, by putting a productive workforce in operation, prisons could become economically self-sustaining (as they used to be when work was mandatory). Third, a tired man is far less likely to start trouble. And fourth, there is nothing better for a man than work and a sense of purpose; it would be infinitely more effective rehabilitation than what we have now.

As for the Sudafed issue, yeah, looks like the time has come for extraordinary measures. Lots of stores around here have already moved it inside locked cabinets.

MM


186 posted on 01/31/2005 2:04:03 PM PST by MississippiMan (Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

I nominate this thread as one of the most depressing I've ever read. Why aren't there more 'meth=suicide' PSAs on TV? I think some genuine scare ads that showed before/after couldn't do any harm and might even disuade someone from taking that first step. And where are the rural churches? What are they doing to combat this horror.


187 posted on 01/31/2005 2:10:08 PM PST by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: TruBluKentuckian
That sounds a lot like my county. I'm a public defender and I see the same things you are seeing. I just wish we'd hurry up and pass the laws putting the psuedoephedrine behind the counters at pharmacies. We are already locking people up left and right for long sentences and that's not doing a bit of good. We get new meth lab cases every week. The only thing that's going to make a big dent in the number of little meth labs is to make the psuedo a lot harder to get in sufficient quantities to make cooking dope worth the effort.
188 posted on 01/31/2005 2:15:37 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
"It hooks it's users immediately and "rarely" lets go far far worse than coke, heroin, liquor abuse."

I don't know about that. Crack and heroin are just as bad as meth. Meth doesn't hook its users immediately either. Most who try it do it once or every once in a while for a time and then quit. Some go on for years using it occasionally and never become addicts. But once the addiction takes hold, it doesn't let go easy. It's really bad stuff but I don't think any drug "hooks its users immediately." If there was a drug like that, no one would want to do it. People who fool around with these substances don't want to become addicts. They see others doing it and not becoming addicted and they think they can get away with it too. But for some reason some people get hooked, usually pretty early on, and it's a tough one to kick.
189 posted on 01/31/2005 2:26:06 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

Again, you are so wrong it's scary.

The "politics of drug policy" has nothing to do with the use of meth. The addicts using, and the sellers making, don't care one way or the other about the politics.

Are you under the assumption that millions of dollars are coming into this, or other, rural counties to combat drugs? If you are, you are woefully wrong. Our police department's drug interdiction budget last year was $4000. That's it... that's all there was. We're talking about a town of less than 2000, not "rural" places like Des Moines, IA or Peoria, IL. Those are "big cities" compared to my little corner of the world.

In no way have we "chosen the prison industry over free enterprise". The jail we are building is to house locals. We are losing money by sending our prisoners to other jails because we don't have room for them. Ninty percent of cases now get probation because there's just no place else to put them.

Yes, there is an infrastructure problem, but it's not something that's fixed overnight. As I've said, we are a rural, agricultural county. We cannot compete with the counties in central Kentucky that have an infrastructure built in from being close to Louisville and Lexington. The state just doesn't care.

The bottom line is, the meth is here, it's a problem, and no amount of economic improvement will change that. If you could instantly build a 4 lane highway through the county, place factory after factory along that highway, give all the farms back to the families and open up every coal mine, meth would STILL be a runaway problem.

The "politics of drug policy" had nothing to do with it.


190 posted on 01/31/2005 2:48:10 PM PST by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer

"And where are the rural churches? What are they doing to combat this horror."

Rural, city, what ever, where ever, being a church doesn't make "a church" the easy solution to this epidemic. It's much more complex than that. What puzzles me is why so many people across the socio-economic lines are willing to digest dangerous toxic poisons that do irreversable damage. The same people won't drink kitchen cleansers straight from the products containers. Why is meth so appealing to so many when they know how dangerous this stuff is? That's the mystery question.


191 posted on 01/31/2005 2:51:57 PM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
" Why is meth so appealing to so many when they know how dangerous this stuff is? That's the mystery question."

According to some it's "the politics of drug policy".
192 posted on 01/31/2005 2:55:08 PM PST by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

" Meth doesn't hook its users immediately either. Most who try it do it once or every once in a while for a time and then quit. "

Well in my area of the USA I have witnessed nothing but permanently hooked and brain damaged meth users.


193 posted on 01/31/2005 2:56:09 PM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: TruBluKentuckian

" Why is meth so appealing to so many when they know how dangerous this stuff is? That's the mystery question."

"According to some it's "the politics of drug policy".


I don't understand, what does that mean?


194 posted on 01/31/2005 2:58:24 PM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide

I was hoping you could tell me.


195 posted on 01/31/2005 2:59:43 PM PST by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: TruBluKentuckian
Ha, yeah right. Sorry I'm just a dumb middle of the road bird brain.
196 posted on 01/31/2005 3:03:45 PM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide

It means that it's easier to blame gov't policy than the lack of hope in the individual.


197 posted on 01/31/2005 3:09:15 PM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch

Meth was already a problem when I was in Portland in the mid-'90s. Absolutely murderous, body and soul-destroying drug. Speed kills, kids, and any regular methamphetamine user is better off out of the American gene pool.


198 posted on 01/31/2005 3:11:49 PM PST by infidel dog (nearer my God to thee....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
In an effort to stem meth production, at least 20 states are now trying to limit the amount of cold medicines and decongestants they will sell to individuals to two packets at any one time. Some states are requiring stores to take them off the shelves entirely. In future, shoppers will have to ask a pharmacist for them directly. The measures are being vigorously opposed by the pharmaceutical industry.

Yeah, let's try the same dumb solutions that have never worked with anything else.

199 posted on 01/31/2005 3:18:56 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
"Well in my area of the USA I have witnessed nothing but permanently hooked and brain damaged meth users."

I'm not trying to say meth isn't a terribly addictive and destructive drug. It's horrible stuff. I hate meth and what I see it doing to people. I just know a lot of people who have used it who never became addicts, and I know people who have become addicted and gotten off of it who are doing fine now with good jobs, families, and that sort of thing. I'm sure things are no different in that respect where you live. You have probably "witnessed" several people who have used meth and never became addicted. They just didn't share that secret with you. I think some people just must be genetically predisposed to addictions to certain substances.

I don't know why it is that some people can play around with these things without getting addicted and others tend to fall into hardcore addiction in short order, but that's just the way it works out. And you can't just look at people and tell who is going to be the guy who gets addicted. I'm nearly forty and when I think of the people I grew up with who became drug addicts, there are some who really surprised me. Some of these people had everything going for them and they gave the appearance of being solid folks. Then one day I found out their lives were crashing down around them because of cocaine or methamphetamine. Actually cocaine was a bigger problem among people I knew because meth wasn't that popular when I was growing up. People did it some but it was viewed more as a "trailer trash drug" and cocaine was more the drug of choice of the young urban professional types. Still though I know plenty of people who have done meth, myself included, and it is not instantly addictive.
200 posted on 01/31/2005 3:22:17 PM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson