To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Ah, assumes facts not in evidence (or at least not on this thread :).
43 posted on
01/29/2005 1:08:43 PM PST by
Ready4Freddy
(Veni Vidi Velcro)
To: Ready4Freddy
I'm not assuming facts. They were facts I read in another news report. Obviously many thought the man intended to be seen (not just me) or the case would not have made it all the way to the Supreme Court. This story just tells the defense perspective.
46 posted on
01/29/2005 1:11:34 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson