Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ready4Freddy

I'm not assuming facts. They were facts I read in another news report. Obviously many thought the man intended to be seen (not just me) or the case would not have made it all the way to the Supreme Court. This story just tells the defense perspective.


46 posted on 01/29/2005 1:11:34 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

I would be very interested to see what the other news report had to say. based on this, it sounds like the neighbors are the ones who should be charged with a crime. They were the peeping toms, hiding behind their blinds, using binoculars and a freaking telescope, trying to tape it....seriously, WTF? Sounds like they were going out of their way to watch something that ordinarily wouldn't be noticable. NOw if the man was actually standing in front of the window on purpose, that's a whole different story. But if he was so clearly visible to the neighbors, why did they need binoculars?


49 posted on 01/29/2005 1:24:31 PM PST by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

'tis OK to post a link to the other stoy(ies) for us.....


50 posted on 01/29/2005 1:27:55 PM PST by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson