Skip to comments.
hysterical Darwinites panic
crosswalk ^
| 2004
| creationist
Posted on 01/28/2005 4:28:41 PM PST by metacognative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 2,281-2,297 next last
To: momincombatboots
Critical home- grown thinking.That doesn't count. Peer review is the essence of science, and one may not indulge in the same unless 21 years old or older.
To: general_re
In any case, you don't see me casting myself as an objective observer, do you? Because you aren't, are you?
62
posted on
01/28/2005 5:14:37 PM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: Oberon
Progressives will not -- can not -- tolerate contrary viewpoints.
63
posted on
01/28/2005 5:14:52 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: WildTurkey
Meyer's proposes that the proof of ID lies in the fact that we have no other way to explain the processes. So let me get this straight. Meyer doesn't believe in Evolution, so some "Intelligent Agent" (not God) must have done it.
Ok.
So where did the Intelligent Agent come from?
64
posted on
01/28/2005 5:15:53 PM PST
by
narby
( A truly Intelligent Designer, would have designed Evolution)
To: tallhappy
None of us are. Some of us are honest enough to admit it. Some aren't.
65
posted on
01/28/2005 5:18:04 PM PST
by
general_re
(How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
To: K4Harty
Much easier to believe than evolution.
Here is an article critical of the Scientific Method. It deals with controversy in the scientific community. I will say it was a very difficult read, and I still dont really understand what the posted work meant.
I will say that I have never read an article in a religious publication that cast doubt on the Creation by Word theory.
66
posted on
01/28/2005 5:19:11 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: narby
Interesting point, but you realized that NO life in any form existed until only a billion years ago. The first few billion were spent just getting the proper conditions for life to evolve (changing the atmosphere from a reducing one to an oxidizing one, etc.). Seems the time for such an amazing process to occur was shorter than you may think. I agree with your tagline, though. God could have used evolution and a process to create life as it is but I absolutely believe that man was made in God's image and so I don't know about the evolution from apes part.
To: wolfpat
I've surfed around the web for some evidence of "Intelligent Design." I can't find it.You monitor is showing static? Even the blue screen of death is evidence of intelligent design. If there were no such thing as intelligent design you wouldn't have a brain and eyeballs to look at things and figure them out.
To: narby
So where did the Intelligent Agent come from? I think he evolved ...
69
posted on
01/28/2005 5:20:15 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: general_re
Does he do astrophysics and analytical chemistry too, or does he limit himself to the life sciences?
Probably the stars are mere points of light in the Heavens.
70
posted on
01/28/2005 5:20:38 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: narby
Trillions of simultaneous processes over an entire planet for billions of years . . . Nice story. Best of all you can tell it any way you want.
To: NRA Patriot 1976
but I absolutely believe that man was made in God's image and so I don't know about the evolution from apes part. What, exactly is meant by "man was made in God's image"?
72
posted on
01/28/2005 5:22:09 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: PeterPhilly
Creationists dont need no stinkin science!
73
posted on
01/28/2005 5:22:51 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Abulafia
I honestly don't know of anyone who uses Darwin's theory to explain how life came about except creationists. Have you honestly ever read Origin of Species?
Anyone who adheres to the notion of speciation is talking about how life came about. Most evolutionists believe in speciation and common ancestry are being dishonest if they claim they are not talking about how life came about. That's why many on FR talk about the "ultimate" origin of life to avoid the appearance of intellectual dishonesty.
74
posted on
01/28/2005 5:22:56 PM PST
by
microgood
(Washington State: Ukraine without the poison)
To: PeterPhilly
He is must be a scientist!
He has a PHD! but so did Martin L. King.
75
posted on
01/28/2005 5:24:59 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: metacognative
I'm a religious person who has absolutely no problems with the theory of evolution, and I can assure you that I'm in no particular state of panic.
76
posted on
01/28/2005 5:25:31 PM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: NRA Patriot 1976
so I don't know about the evolution from apes partMan did not evolve from the ape. The are on different branches of the evolutionary tree.
77
posted on
01/28/2005 5:27:14 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: NRA Patriot 1976
I've dealt with when confronted with the immense numbers of protein-protein interactions that much occur in exact fashion, for example, hint at the impossibility that life could evolve to it's present form over millions of years by chance.
Millions? How about billions about 2.5 billion years? Did you cut a few classes?
78
posted on
01/28/2005 5:28:57 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
I'm a religious person who has absolutely no problems with the theory of evolution, and I can assure you that I'm in no particular state of panic. I'm a spiratual person who has absolutely no problems with spirituality, and I can assure you that I'm in no particular state of panic. I do have a problem with a lot of "religions" ...
79
posted on
01/28/2005 5:30:24 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Calanus
And Yoda is your English teacher. LOL! Thanks for that little barb. I needed a good chuckle. I do posess a sense of humor, and I tend to garble thoughts when I type something out and then attempt to revise it for clarity.
However, my point is that the story reveals that rather than engage in honest discussion about Dr. Meyer's arguement, the evolutionist community brands his ideas as "substandard science" and calls it "recycled material quite common in the intelligent design community". The statement "tottering house of ideological cards that is more about cherished mythology than honest intellectual endeavor" is backed up by the facts given in the full article. He is dismissed as a heretic, with no facts given to disprove his theory. He has been burned at the scientific stake for blasphemy.
80
posted on
01/28/2005 5:31:12 PM PST
by
EricT.
(Join the Soylent Green Party...We recycle dead environmentalists.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 2,281-2,297 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson