Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mudblood

He is innocent until proven guilty.


60 posted on 01/28/2005 9:25:52 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: conserv13

"He is innocent until proven guilty"

No, conserv13, he is not guilty in the eyes of the law until he is proven guilty but that has little or nothing, unfortunately, to do with whether he actually committed the crimes. There are many guilty persons who have beaten the rap. For Jackson, I believe he is certainly warped in his relationships with children and, whether he has committed a crime or not or whether he is exonerated or found guilty, I will have nothing whatsoever to do with him and will advise all parents to keep their children from him. He is a sick man who needs intensive therapy if not institutionalizing, if for nothing else than his self-mutilation.


67 posted on 01/28/2005 9:49:55 AM PST by caseinpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

"He is innocent until proven guilty."

He's been proven guilty time and time again. He admitted to sleeping in the bed with children and he has pictures of naked children in his house. Guilt is something metaphysical, and not something dished out by the courts. If he dies before the trial concludes, will God look at him and say, "You know, you were never actually convicted - come on through!" If God exists, the answer would be no. "Innocent until proven guilty" is a nice policy, but a guilty person is never innocent simply because it hasn't yet been proven. If he gets off this time, he should avoid dark alleys.


90 posted on 01/28/2005 11:15:14 AM PST by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson