[capt. norm]

Knight-Ridder is obviously pushing their liberal agenda.

Scientists don't operate on the basis of how many agree and how many disagree on something. This gives away the liberal slant because that's the way liberal journalists think: the truth is identified by how big a majority believe it. "Science by consensus is a liberal fantasy.

[Sacajaweau]

There's articles that go way back to the 30's at least which talk about global warming.

I'd guess that volcanoes, both above ground and in the ocean contribute to NATURAL global warming more than a few billion people with technology.

It's a man against creation mentality...that we can fix what's "WE THINK" is wrong with the workings of "Universe".

But we still have hurricanes, we still have volcanic eruptions, we still have the release of huge amounts of methane from the seas.

Man can only be a compensator whose job is to help the unfortunates who were in the path of mother nature.

I think perhaps that a good way of looking at this is taking the entire population AND it's improvements and reducing them perspectively to size of the universe. It would be a dot!!

[bootless]

"Science by consensus is a liberal fantasy.

Exactly. I devoured this book on the way to the Inauguration and back. These scientists go for the popular vote method of science ... not the method used for scientific rigor.