To: snugs
Did you find her comments confusing too, snugs?
Wanting the Republican Party to include her, but admitting that the Republican Party and specifically this administration DID include her?
Very mixed up lady, IMO.....
119 posted on
01/27/2005 7:47:52 PM PST by
ohioWfan
(Have you PRAYED for your President today?)
To: ohioWfan
Yes I did find her confusing. I can appreciate her premise that the party should be a broad church but in one breath saying it is and then saying it is not is confusing.
I would assume that in US the same as the UK a candidate in one area may have different views than one in another because of local issues both current and historic. Some areas are more "liberal" in view not politics than others hence different candidate, so really at the end of day I just think it was sour grapes.
The best bit was when Sean asked her if she had actually spoken to the President about her concerns when she was in the Cabinet and she said no because the meeting were on policy relating to her job (paraphrased). Sean seemed an incredulous as I was if you felt that strongly somehow you would have mentioned it regardless of the fact that it was not relevant to your current discussion or more accurately she was probably protecting her job.
126 posted on
01/27/2005 7:57:11 PM PST by
snugs
(An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
To: ohioWfan
She's only done one good thing, and we all know what that was.
145 posted on
01/27/2005 8:08:47 PM PST by
altura
(tolerance is an overrated virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson