[Protagoras]

Are you saying that coming to this conclusion, based on the absence of hearing anything is logical?

Perfectly logical. No one can tell me why it matters what they do if there is no God, therefore I must conclude that my conclusion was correct.

But I have already told you, I'll keep an open mind. I withdraw if you can explain why it is. I notice you didn't answer, but instead changed the subject back to my conclusion. Make your case,,,,if you can.

[BikerNYC]

No one can tell me why it matters what they do if there is no God.

It only matters if one decides that it matters.

Now tell me, how does it matter if there is a God?

[spunkets]

"Perfectly logical. No one can tell me why it matters what they do if there is no God, therefore I must conclude that my conclusion was correct.

In order to come to the conclusion that something is in fact illogical, then you must be able to show, or prove how it is illogical. You can not come to such a conclusion based on an empty set. It's illogical.

" I notice you didn't answer, but instead changed the subject back to my conclusion. "

Your conclusion is the subject.