Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Confirms Rice As Secretary of State (85-13)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/26/05 | Barry Schweid - AP

Posted on 01/26/2005 9:23:45 AM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) won easy confirmation Wednesday to be President Bush (news - web sites)'s new secretary of state, despite strong dissent from a small group of Democrats who said she shares blame for mistakes and war deaths in Iraq (news - web sites).

The Senate voted 85 to 13 to confirm Rice, who succeeds Colin Powell (news - web sites) as America's top diplomat and becomes the first black woman to hold the job.

Plans were made for her to be sworn in at the White House Wednesday night, take her place in the State Department Thursday morning and have a more elaborate swearing-in by Bush at the agency on Friday.

The Senate vote showed some of the partisanship that delayed Rice's confirmation vote by several days. Twelve Democrats and independent James Jeffords (news - web sites) of Vermont voted against Rice. The Democrats included some of the Senate's best-known members such as Massachusetts Democratic Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and John Kerry (news - web sites), who was the party's presidential candidate in last year's election. Thirty Democrats voted for her.

Democratic foes of her appointment focused mostly on the way Bush and Rice took the United States to war in Iraq and how they have handled the war with insurgents since deposing Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).

They said mistakes had led to mounting American casualties. As the debate drew to a close, word came from Iraq of the crash of a U.S. military transport helicopter in bad weather, killing at least 30 people in the worst U.S. loss since the war.

Rice's nomination was never in doubt, however. Republicans had hoped to hold the vote last week, on the same day that Bush took the oath for his second term, but Democrats asked for more time. The GOP accused Democrats of inappropriately delaying Rice's confirmation to make political statements about Iraq policy.

Rice, 50, is Bush's trusted national security aide and a main architect of his policies on Iraq and the war on terror.

Although Rice was assured of confirmation, she got the most "no" votes since World War II. Seven senators voted against Henry Kissinger and six each against Dean Acheson and Alexander Haig.

"Dr. Rice is an honorable, fine public servant who needs to be confirmed," Bush said during a news conference Wednesday. "She will be a great secretary of state and Dr. Rice and I look forward to moving forward."

Bush rejected claims by Democrats that they had been lied to in the run-up to the war in Iraq.

On the Senate floor Wednesday, Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., suggested Democrats are sore losers. Rice had enough votes to win confirmation, as even her Democratic critics acknowledge, McCain said.

"So I wonder why we are starting this new Congress with a protracted debate about a foregone conclusion," McCain said. Since Rice is qualified for the job, he said, "I can only conclude that we are doing this for no other reason than because of lingering bitterness over the outcome of the election."

What had seemed at the outset to be a cinch turned into sometimes angry debate over Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq, his struggle with a potent insurgency and Rice's role in helping him make a case for overthrowing Saddam.

An academic who specialized in the study of the now-defunct Soviet Union, she has been one of Bush's closest advisers as his national security adviser for four years. In testimony last week to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, she swore she has not been shy about disagreeing with him privately at times.

Now, she will be at his side trying to improve relations with European allies, pursuing a Middle East settlement between Israel and the Palestinians, seeking a way to stop North Korea (news - web sites) and Iran from developing nuclear weapons — and, above all, trying to pacify Iraq with limited additional U.S. casualties.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: confirmation; confirms; congratulations; lurch; rice; senate; soreloosers; swimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-190 next last
To: Marysecretary

Akaka - I was thinking the same thing but thought it was just my trashy mind. :o) I think he has been more of a dino than the frothing leftists. Surprising that he joined into the stupidity but believe he is one of those who would like to see Rummy gone..


121 posted on 01/26/2005 10:45:12 AM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

The Dims are divided, that's clear. They have to choose their battles, and they know their court filibuster is lost -- they've alienated the public, alienated their own, alienated their Republican colleagues, and pretty soon will be out of jobs, one way or the other. And in the future, in the school textbooks, they'll be listed as among the obstructionists, like the opponents of civil rights legislation. :')


122 posted on 01/26/2005 10:45:59 AM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

oh well, similar, a bit older:

Condi Rice Nomination for Sec. of State: update: Confirmation by 85-13 vote
C-Span ^ | 1/26/04
Posted on 01/26/2005 7:01:23 AM PST by gopwinsin04
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1328891/posts


123 posted on 01/26/2005 10:48:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

Bayh's vote shocked me, too. I have always thought that if I could ever stomach a Rat President again, it would be him. A surprising turn, but the good news is he has joined the cabal and now my disgust of all things in the Rat party is without exception.


124 posted on 01/26/2005 10:49:39 AM PST by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: deport
I'm from IL and I'm ashamed of our senior Senator Durbin. This man has done nothing for this state except be a political ambulance chaser for the Democratic party. I see our Jr. Senator Obama voted yes for Condi. I heard a sound clip from him last night on the local radio and his tone was different from Durbin's. I just know "Dick" will start trying to manhandle Obama on the political stage and try to keep him in step with the old left line. Dick and the other 11 Dems represent the old guard of the Party. Look at Ted Kennedy and how he can't even remember Obama's name. He called him Osama.... I plan to work hard against Durbin in his reelection. The push should be to get these 12 Dems voted out of office in the next four years. They are the majority of the problem for this nation.
125 posted on 01/26/2005 10:52:52 AM PST by rip033
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

"The Democratic Party is shredding, and we get to watch! :')"


Yes it certainly is and how beautiful it is to watch.

From this day forward, the below list will be remembered by me as ....

"The Byrd Bigot Brigade"

Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.
Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.
Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.
John Kerry, D-Mass.
Carl Levin, D-Mich.
James Jeffords, I-Vt.
Jack Reed, D-R.I
Mark Dayton, D-Minn.
Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii
Evan Bayh, D-Ind.
Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.
Tom Harkin, D-Iowa
Richard Durbin, D-Ill.


126 posted on 01/26/2005 10:56:57 AM PST by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

The problem is, of course, that some of the radicals blended in with the majority. They will also have to go.


127 posted on 01/26/2005 11:06:00 AM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub
I believe you but he was defending a friend.

Which doesn't explain these:

McCain: Same-sex marriage ban is un-Republican

Sen. McCain: We Conservatives Oppose Bush's Tax Cuts (BARF ALERT)

Push to Pass McCain-Lieberman Global Warming Bill: up next week - IT’S ALL BUNK

McCain is a liberal in anybodys book. And he called the SwiftVets ads "dishonest and dishonorable". He's a RINO.

128 posted on 01/26/2005 11:06:22 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Slippery, Slicktey, Slidey, Bumpus.....SNOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: rip033
Ted, drunk at the office again:
Google

129 posted on 01/26/2005 11:08:09 AM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I guess that Harry Reid voted Aye because he's still working off his last racist slur?

-PJ

130 posted on 01/26/2005 11:09:02 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Heroes and Zeroes (Finally NOW weighs in on Condoleezza Rice as SOS)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1328727/posts

"Heroes and Zeroes"

Below the Belt: a Biweekly Column by NOW President Kim Gandy

January 21, 2005


131 posted on 01/26/2005 11:11:46 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

well I guessy you are head strong but of course you are buffering your arguement with all the stuff YOU want and not all the facts......please plst McCain's full record and not just your facts and then it will be more detailed and honest......plus, hey, am I a RINO cause I think Bush is a spending fool.........he has spent more in his term (not including the war) than Clinton did for goodness sake. and Repubs are woefully inadequate on immigration. If you cherry pick you could call everyone a RINO......almost.


132 posted on 01/26/2005 11:12:37 AM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub
well I didn't use the word "moderate" I said non partisan but even pundits like Hannity and others have descrobed him this way. The thing about him is he doesn't lash out and become rabid like alot of the Dems.......I will listen to anyone that is civil with their discourse. When you listen to him in interviews he is quite reasoned. Not a conservative but reasonable

I didn't say you used the word "moderate". I used it and put it in quotes to denote my disdain for its application to him. I'm well aware of Bayh's reputation and history. I've listened to him in plenty of interviews and on the Senate Floor. I listen to all of these politicians.

He established himself with his comments yesterday and his declaration to vote no on Rice and his actual vote, not only as a partisan, but an extreme partisan.

133 posted on 01/26/2005 11:13:36 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: deport
The only surprise for me, Evan Bayh of Indiana. He has the reputation of being a moderate, often touted as a presidential possibility, and frankly, he's the only democrat I thought capable of giving us a good run in 2006.

Maybe this vote signals he IS in the running, and he's taken this vote to get kudos from the far left of the party.

134 posted on 01/26/2005 11:17:17 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Hillary Has To Move To The Middle, Bayh Would Have To Move To The Left.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Unless someone has already posed this question and I have not yet read it,who were the No's?


135 posted on 01/26/2005 11:19:27 AM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

i know hari "KERRY" is an individual choice
i still volunteer to help. the bit*h


136 posted on 01/26/2005 11:25:23 AM PST by 537cant be wrong (no kittie! thats my pot pie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

LOL!!!!


137 posted on 01/26/2005 11:26:36 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub
well I guess you are head strong but of course you are buffering your arguement with all the stuff YOU want and not all the facts.

I gave you facts. I know a liberal when I see one. McCain consistently backs liberal agendas. Look at what McCain-Feingold did for the last election. I don't like McCain and it has NOTHING to do with Bush or Clinton. McCain isn't even a moderate Republican. And, what is McCains full record? I searched FRs archive and you saw what I found.

138 posted on 01/26/2005 11:28:22 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Slippery, Slicktey, Slidey, Bumpus.....SNOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming

I don't remember hearing about him but his name certainly struck my funny (but trashy) bone. LOL. M


139 posted on 01/26/2005 11:28:53 AM PST by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ShowMeMom

Focus your $$ on whomever runs against Mark Dayton in MN,and Jeffords in VT. Don't forget that Byrd will be 88 in '06 and Corzine will probably run for Guv in NJ.

Put me down for supporting whomever runs against these clowns!! add Stabenow and Cantwell to this list as well.


140 posted on 01/26/2005 11:30:52 AM PST by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson