To: Ditto
By the same token, rejecting a Creator based on Evolutionary theory, has absolutely no scientific basis and can not be supported in scientific terms. Those who claim there is no Creator are simply stating their belief In the THOUSANDS of posts in the last few weeks, I have NEVER seen anyone reject the Creator based on evolutionary theory.
345 posted on
01/26/2005 12:15:51 PM PST by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: WildTurkey
In the THOUSANDS of posts in the last few weeks, I have NEVER seen anyone reject the Creator based on evolutionary theory. In the THOUSANDS of posts in the last few weeks, I have NEVER seen anyone entertain the Creator is even slightly possible if they were already committed to random-chance-natural-selection-based evolutionary theory.
360 posted on
01/26/2005 12:58:57 PM PST by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon.htm)
To: WildTurkey
In the THOUSANDS of posts in the last few weeks, I have NEVER seen anyone reject the Creator based on evolutionary theory. I wasn't speaking about posters here (and I haven't read thousands of posts on this myself). I simply meant to point out that evolution says nothing about Creation, but I'm sure in the wide-wide world, there are those who cite evolution to deny Creation. My point is that it can not be used that way.
There seems to be long range artillery barrages going on between Biblical literalists and secular atheists and too often shells are falling short on those of us in the middle who find no logical, theological or scientific problem in accepting both Creation and Evolution.
369 posted on
01/26/2005 1:42:55 PM PST by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson