[Ditto]

In the THOUSANDS of posts in the last few weeks, I have NEVER seen anyone reject the Creator based on evolutionary theory.

I wasn't speaking about posters here (and I haven't read thousands of posts on this myself). I simply meant to point out that evolution says nothing about Creation, but I'm sure in the wide-wide world, there are those who cite evolution to deny Creation. My point is that it can not be used that way.

There seems to be long range artillery barrages going on between Biblical literalists and secular atheists and too often shells are falling short on those of us in the middle who find no logical, theological or scientific problem in accepting both Creation and Evolution.

[WildTurkey]

I wasn't speaking about posters here (and I haven't read thousands of posts on this myself). I simply meant to point out that evolution says nothing about Creation, but I'm sure in the wide-wide world, there are those who cite evolution to deny Creation. My point is that it can not be used that way.

And scientists do not use it that way. There are some that use the Bible to enslave and torture.

[WildTurkey]

There seems to be long range artillery barrages going on between Biblical literalists and secular atheists and too often shells are falling short on those of us in the middle who find no logical, theological or scientific problem in accepting both Creation and Evolution.

Almost. The missiles launched by the Biblical literalists are intended to destroy evolution and are intentionally falling on all those that believe in science and believe that religion should not be in the science class.