Thank you. I have been reading several threads these past few weeks where many many freepers basically say "evolution is "more than fact" - but you don't see them add your thoughtful rejoinder.
It has been quite illuminating....
It has always baffled me how any scientist could refute the scientific method, a foundation that has been the basis of progression of every science known to man. Before the scientific method most science was bunk; based on conjecture, coincidence, and papal decrees. And what do you know, this article pretty much covers the gamut with evolution. ROFLMFAO!!!
Really? Then feel free to provide even a single example.
It has been quite illuminating....
It has, but probably not in the way you intended.