Posted on 01/25/2005 4:51:09 PM PST by mario12
You are sort of correct. It is actually a repost of an article that is dated in the link as Dec 2001. Note the tense in references to Iraqi nuke efforts and to Arafat.
It is also the greatest justification for an Israeli preemptive strike that could ever be given.
Arafat is dead, so when were these remarks made? I suspect it was not recently (though I doubt the sentiments of the Khomeiniacs have changed much.
This looks to be a very old article. It still states that Iraq is believed ti be developing nukes.
wait, it is an old article from 2001.
Sounds like they have brain "damages" only.
Did Iran ever offer an apology for holding our embassy personnel hostage in 1970s? Did I miss that?
This is why selective preemptive air strikes make sense with this crowd. Won't take out all their facilities but slow em down a tad and draw a line in the sand. Not too much Iran could do about it either.
Hmmm....
... or are you trolling?
Besides, it is the responsibility of good people in Iran to get rid of this guy before he gets them all killed.
Certainly there should be no more important ambition to an Iranian than survival, and at the moment, that's in question!
Darwin award candidate...
Wow! This is a special kind of delusion. Israel has closer to 600 atomic and hydrogen bombs with multiple delivery methods including 2nd strike capability. Who is writing this script? It seems to me that this is exactly what Israel and the U.S.A. need to bring force down on Iran before they develop the capability.
I thought Ronald Reagan already did that.
I thought that World War III (the Cold War) began in 1947 under President Truman, and that it was finally won by The Immortal, Ronaldus Magnus, but that George Bush #41 accepted the surrender in 1990.
This is World War IV!
World War V will be the one with China and India.
Also, I think even hinting at nuking Israel is effectively a suicidal gesture. At 72 virgins per Islamofascist martyr, the Iranian hereafter is gonna run out of virgins real quick!
Is it really Rafsanjani, or is it actor Paul Dooley?
HMMMMM.........Troll like behavior is being exhibited.....Your posts seem to follow a pattern: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=mario12
Muslim clerics will be the ones who trigger the use of nukes. Muslim clerics already convince the gullible to be suicide-homicide bombers. Muslim clerics already convince the gullible to kill fellow Muslims who do not follow the cleric's religious orders.
Muslim clerics--the leaders of the killer-dogs of Islam. And many Muslims willingly follows them by their deeds, by financial support, and in least--by their silence..
Sand to glass baby any time you are ready to rock and roll. You will hit us once, and we will make your country cease to exist. Should I also mention that we will destroy Mecca?
These kitties are interested nuclear war....
http://www.rathergood.com/gaybar/
Not a threat by to initiate nukes, but rather warning Israel that someday it won't have the option of using nukes to repel a conventional invasion.
Because Iran and the Muslim world will absorb a first strike and still incinerate Israel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.