Posted on 01/25/2005 8:50:18 AM PST by franky
Anti-abortion demonstrators march through Washington
U.S. president plays cheerleader in chief`This movement will not fail,' he tells them
WASHINGTONAbortion demonstrators marched though chilly Washington yesterday, emboldened by Republican election gains they said gave new momentum to their 32-year fight to overturn Roe v. Wade. U.S. President George W. Bush told them by phone, "This movement will not fail."
Protest leaders said stronger Republican majorities in both houses of Congress and Bush's re-election reflect the public's support for more restrictions on abortion. Chief Justice William Rehnquist's battle with thyroid cancer injected a sense of urgency into this year's demonstrations, nearly guaranteeing one retirement on the high court during Bush's second term.
For his part, Bush played cheerleader in chief at a rally before the march, telling tens of thousands of pro-life demonstrators on the Ellipse that their approach to the debate this year would "change hearts and minds" of those still favouring abortion rights. "This is the path of the culture of life that we seek for our country," Bush said by phone from Camp David, Md.
Every anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, prompts demonstrations by opponents and supporters of abortion rights. Activists on both sides of the issue marched in demonstrations across the country Saturday, the actual anniversary of the Jan. 22 decision.
In Albany, N.Y., Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton told about 1,000 fellow abortion rights supporters yesterday that during the administrations of her husband, Bill Clinton, family planning funding was a priority and "we saw the rate of abortion consistently fall."
She complained that the Bush administration is short-changing family planning efforts, and said that may be causing abortion rates to rise again. "Unfortunately in the last few years, while we are engaged in ideological debate instead of one that uses facts and evidence and common sense, the rate of abortion is on the rise in some states," she said. "In the (first) three years since President Bush took office, eight states have seen an increase in abortion rates and four saw a decrease."
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Huh?
She complained that the Bush administration is short-changing family planning efforts
Huh?
Shrillary is full of used food.
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
Proud to say Texas has decreased tremendously in the past few years.
###"In the (first) three years since President Bush took office, eight states have seen an increase in abortion rates and four saw a decrease."####
This is certaily news to Pro-Life advocates.
It would be illustrative to know which states are "blue" and which are "red".
Please don't change titles.
I guess she didn't consider this research from PSU.
Reduced Access Lowers Abortion Rates
12-02-97
University Park, Pa. -- Restrictive state policies and the lack of medical providers have effectively decreased the rate of abortions in the United States, according to researchers.
"Abortion rates are generally higher along the West and East coasts, where states tend to place fewer conditions on an abortion and offer an abundance of providers compared to less populated regions," says Dr. Stephen A. Matthews, research associate with the Population Research Institute at Penn State and adjunct assistant professor of geography.
"The most common restrictions on abortion are Medicaid funding limits, 24-hour waiting periods, mandatory counseling and parental consent requirements for minors," Matthews notes. "From a pragmatic standpoint, these restrictions have made a difference in abortion rates. Calculations indicate that decreased access, due largely to restrictions, accounted for 24-30 percent of the 5 percent decline in abortion rates between 1988 and 1992."
"Conversely, birthrates go up where the costs of contraception are higher due to reduced access to providers of contraceptive methods and advice such as obstetrician-gynecologists and family planning services," says Dr. Mark O. Wilhelm, assistant professor of economics at Penn State.
Matthews, Wilhelm and David Ribar, assistant professor of economics at George Washington University, are authors of the paper, "The Effects of Economic Conditions and Access to Reproductive Health Services on State Abortion Rates and Birthrates," which appeared in the journal Family Planning Perspectives.
For the period 1988-92, the Alan Guttmacher Institute documented substantial declines in both the incidence and availability of abortions in the United States. Nationwide the abortion rate fell by 5 percent, from 27.3 abortions per 1,000 women to 25.9 per 1,000. At the same time, the proportion of women living in counties with an abortion provider fell from 71 to 69 percent, and the number of providers per 100,000 women fell from 4.4 to 4.0.
"In 1973, the year of Roe vs. Wade, 15 counties in Pennsylvania had abortion providers. By 1977, this number had risen to 32 counties, but by the early 1990s it was back down to 16," says Matthews.
A 1992 Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI) paper reported that, during the late 1980s, 83 percent of U.S. counties and 20 percent of urban areas had no licensed physicians or service providers who dealt with abortion cases. As a result, in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region, 18 percent of the women seeking information about an abortion had to drive between 50 and 100 miles. Another 9 percent drove 100 miles or more, Matthews adds.
"Our results make clear that policies that either expressly or indirectly reduce women's access to abortion services decrease their use of the procedure," says Wilhelm.
"The Supreme Court has generally held regulations to be invalid if they place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman desiring or considering an abortion," he notes. "The contentious issue of whether policies go too far in restricting access is being resolved by the Court under its standard of `undue burden.' "
"While the Court has applied its test one restriction at a time, our findings suggest that the `undue burden' standard should be broadened to consider availability of abortion providers in certain geographical regions," says Matthews.
The study uses 1978-88 data combined from more than a dozen sources including the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Current Population Survey (CPS) and the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
**pab**
EDITORS: Dr. Matthews can be reached at (814) 863-9721 (office) or at Matthews@pop.psu.edu by email; Dr. Wilhelm is at (814) 863-7416 or at wilhelm@pop.psu.edu by email; and Dr. Ribar is at (202) 994-7608 or at dcr7@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu by email.
Contacts:
Paul Blaum (814) 865-9481 (office) (814) 867-1126 (home) pab15@psu.edu
Vicki Fong (814) 865-9481 (office) (814) 238-1221 (home) vyf1@psu.edu
For other Penn State news, please visit our Home Page on the Web at: http://www.psu.edu/ur/ Also browse this release at EurekAlert!, a comprehensive news server for up-to-date research in science, medicine, and engineering at http://www.eurekalert.org/
Hillary supports murder, much the same way Hitler did. She's a very sick individual.
What a legacy! And he did it all in only 8 years. Wow! I'm so impressed!!
definaitly! (sp) ?
STATS show that if no abortions were performed from 1978 on that Gore would've creamed Bush in 2000 because most abortions are done by demonRAT mothers. So in essence THEY'RE KILLING THEMSELVES OFF! Conservatives have far fewer abortions.
the reason that abortions are on the rise is that people are not taking responsibility for their actions
bttt
Strange that a "Catholic" be given space on a Presbyterian Web site.
What is worse is that she presents a non-Catholic view that war and economy is equal to abortion. The Church states that, "Abortion is intrinsically evil and should not be compared to any other issue including death from war".
The article is strictly from an apostates view.
Agreed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.