Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Woodworker
The right answer, IMHO, is Social Security reform including appropriate provisions about dividing the surviving spouse benefits amongst all the surviving spouses.

Fortunately we don't have legal polygamy in this country (yet) so we don't have surviving spouses. We only have a surviving spouse.

Of course if 'gay marriage' is legalized we'll have legal polygamy within a year.

12 posted on 01/25/2005 10:24:42 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: John O
you're right. Now we have only a surviving spouse. For Gay marriage, we need to have surviving spouses (speece?). Then divide amongst them. I'll bet there will be "speece" in the background of most parties to a gay marriage.
14 posted on 01/25/2005 11:42:01 AM PST by Woodworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: John O
Fortunately we don't have legal polygamy in this country (yet) so we don't have surviving spouses. We only have a surviving spouse.

If a marriage has lasted 10 years, the surviving spouses may collect if he/she has not remarried even if the deceased spouse has remarried. So yes, we can have surviving spouses.

17 posted on 01/25/2005 2:38:33 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson