Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KEMP LETTER READS LIKE LOBBY FOR OIL SPY
New York Post ^ | 1/25/05 | NILES LATHEM

Posted on 01/25/2005 12:30:14 AM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON — A blistering letter written by former vice-presidential candidate Jack Kemp to congressional leaders, criticizing the 1998 U.S. bombing of Iraq, has raised new questions about whether he was promoting a secret agenda on behalf of Saddam Hussein's oil spy in the United States, The Post has learned.

[snip]

In a statement issued by Kemp's office, Empower America, over the weekend, the former upstate GOP congressman and Buffalo Bill football star said he believed Vincent was "motivated by the national security of the United States and thought the Iraqi government believed the sanctions could never be lifted, which he said he believed was leading them to obstruct inspectors from coming into the country."

One congressional official involved in the U.N. oil-for-food investigation said, "Knowing what we know now, the question is: Where did Jack Kemp get this stuff?

"It looks like Samir Vincent did a very good lobbying job."

[snip]

Kemp denied there were any business or financial dealings with Vincent, who is Iraqi-born, saying they talked only about "policy."

Kemp's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said last week that he believes Kemp was duped by Vincent and did not know Vincent was on Saddam's payroll.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: empoweramerica; jackkemp; lannydavis; off; oilforfood; samirvincent; vincent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2005 12:30:14 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Jack, first shoot your lawyer. O.K., you've done that? Good, now... Oh, well, that was it actually.


2 posted on 01/25/2005 12:51:40 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Jack, Jack, you've hired Lanny Davis to defend you? Mr.-Amway-Salesman? Mr.-Democrat's-Democrat? Mr.-I'll-Do-Anything-Hillary-Or-Bill-Tells-Me-To-Do?

Say it ain't so, Jack, say it ain't so.

3 posted on 01/25/2005 12:53:12 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
<< A blistering letter written by former vice-presidential candidate Jack Kemp to congressional leaders, criticizing the 1998 U.S. bombing of Iraq [Points to the fact Kemp] .... was promoting a secret agenda on behalf of Saddam Hussein's oil spy in the United States, The Post has learned ....

In a statement .... Kemp's office, Empower Americaclaimed he] "believed Vincent was "motivated by the national security of the United States and thought the Iraqi government believed the sanctions could never be lifted, which he said he believed was leading them to obstruct inspectors from coming into the country."

.... "Knowing what we know now, the question is: Where did Jack Kemp get this stuff?

"It looks like Samir Vincent did a very good lobbying job."

..... Kemp's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said last week that he believes Kemp .... "did not know [He, Kemp] was [Effectively] on Saddam's payroll.

Yair.

Right.

The whiny little career-politician bastard.

4 posted on 01/25/2005 12:53:46 AM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Adua Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Where did Kemp get that idea? Well, that line about Iraq not believing sanctions could ever be lifted comes from Maddie Albright, who told the Iraqis flat out that even if they complied with the UN demands sanctions would ever be lifted.


5 posted on 01/25/2005 1:12:22 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Shermy

It's going to get real interesting....this goes deep into the halls of power.


6 posted on 01/25/2005 4:43:26 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog

At this point I am inclined to believe Kemp was talked to by Vincent to promote a certain point of view and had no idea about his ties to Saddam and real agenda.

Let's also keep in mind that his "blistering letter" of Dec. 18, 1998 was the original day the impeachment vote was to take place and many believed Clinton bombed in order to avoid the vote, which was held the next day instead.

I am interested but not surprised that out of the whole list of oil recipients, the one person who is getting all the press right now is a Republican who all evidence to date shows was motivated by policy and philosophy, not by a desire to aid Saddam and work against the U.S.

I don't think it is fair to assume that because someone met with Samir Vincent they therefore were aware he was really working on behalf of Saddam Hussein and also was paid via the Oil for Food scam for their positions. Is there any evidence Kemp received money for this? I do not think there is.


7 posted on 01/25/2005 5:03:48 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Is there evidence Kemp received proceeds from the Oil for Food scam...much less that he took money at all to take the positions he held?


8 posted on 01/25/2005 5:05:06 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One congressional official involved in the U.N. oil-for-food investigation said, "Knowing what we know now, the question is: Where did Jack Kemp get this stuff?

Any bets on which side of the aisle this "congressional official" hails from?

This pushing Kemp to the forefront of a scandal in which he seems to have been at worst a useful fool (as opposed to intentionally undermining the U.S. and actually pro-actively helping Saddam Hussein, which is--let's keep in mind--what the real scandal and the long list of barrels of oil recipients is all about) is meant to obfuscate and when the dem names start getting attention, meant to be used as "they all do it".

But they don't all do it, and it would be wise to keep in mind what this investigatin and scandal are all about.

9 posted on 01/25/2005 5:11:11 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Kemp in the 1992 campaign lost my respect during the Gore/Kemp debate. Gore said, "Jack you are ONE of the GOOD Repbulicans." and all Kemp did was say thank you, as if theat was true. He is not one of the good Republicans he is one of the fortunate Republicans because voters THOUGHT he reflected what we already where doing and he would carry our message - but he was not and continued the slid since then.

Now we know that he was - is - another greedy guy that hides in a Liberal closet wearing the mantle of a conservative. Hope his speaking tours are all cancelled.

10 posted on 01/25/2005 5:24:37 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

We know he's "greedy"???

To date there has been no report that he took money (much less have we been presented with any evidence that he received money from the Oil for Food scam) for taking his (misguided) Iraq policy position.


11 posted on 01/25/2005 5:32:58 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Kemp has no brains. Pimp for oil, hire Davis as a lawyer? Best Kemp be put away in old fools home before he hurts himself.


12 posted on 01/25/2005 5:36:43 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Once again, Jack Kemp is shown to have made the kind of bone head mistake that spoiled his political career. Against that, Kemp's single great accomplishment nevertheless endures: his passionate and successful advocacy of massive, across the board tax cuts spurred Reagan's candidacy in 1980 and, when those cuts were enacted, reversed an era of American pessimism and decline.


13 posted on 01/25/2005 6:57:14 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
He should have retired from public life after the Kemp-Roth tax cuts were enacted.

It would have spared the Republican Party a lot of unnecessary headaches.

14 posted on 01/25/2005 5:21:54 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Anxiously awaiting the coming of the Tupacalypse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Perhaps, for Kemp has been a disappointment and at times an embarrassment; but there are far many more whom I would have wanted off the stage before him.
15 posted on 01/25/2005 9:27:28 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Long ago I cut up my Empower America card. I know them not.


16 posted on 01/25/2005 9:30:07 PM PST by Drango (To Serve Man.....IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

I didn't realize Kemp had stood in for Quayle during the 1992 VP debate.


17 posted on 01/25/2005 9:33:44 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; Drango; bobdole; 2banana; Dolemite; cyborg; King Prout
Bob Dole:

Bob Dole's running-mate back in '96. Very poor choice on the part of Bob Dole. Yup, Bob Dole has many regrets. Bob Dole's bad.

18 posted on 01/26/2005 5:56:23 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Your influence counts...USE IT!" (Bob Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

My date may be off - what I ment was the Gore Kemp debate. Now that happened when Kemp ran with Dole in 1996 if I put 92 that was a finger error - but Gore said what he said and KEMP took credit for being the Good Republican - even Rush has commented on this debate and Kemp's response. It PO me then and even more as I see Kemp lining his pockets with corrupt money.


19 posted on 01/26/2005 8:05:47 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

I knew what you meant, of course. Actually, I remember Quayle doing quite well against Gore in 1992. Alas, it wasn't enough.


20 posted on 01/26/2005 10:44:37 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson