Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul - Want to Reform Social Security? Stop Spending.
House Web Site ^ | 1-24-2005 | Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)

Posted on 01/24/2005 10:20:14 AM PST by jmc813

Social Security reform promises to be the biggest domestic issue this year in Washington, but most of the proposals are nothing more than flim-flam. The only honest solution to the future insolvency of the program is for Congress to stop spending so much money. Unless Congress makes real cuts in spending-- and stops spending Social Security taxes on completely unrelated programs-- millions of Americans simply will not receive even a fraction of the money they paid into Social Security. Ignore the rhetoric about tax increases and cuts in benefits, as though you are to blame for the problem! All Social Security obligations could be met if Congress did not spend so much on other things.

In the 1930s, Social Security was presented to the American people as a social insurance program, with individuals paying a monthly “premium” in exchange for retirement benefits later. It was supposed to be a forced savings program, based on the assumption that some people would be unable or unwilling to save for their older years. Seven decades later, however, the ratio of younger working people to older retirees has changed dramatically, exposing the Ponzi-like congressional raid on the system itself. What has not changed, however, is our willingness to accept the notion that the government should force us to save for our older years.

Notice that neither political party proposes letting people opt out of Social Security, which exposes the lie that your contributions are set aside and saved. After all, if your contributions really are put aside for your retirement, the money will be there earning interest, right? If your money is put away in a trust fund account with your name on it, what difference would it make if your neighbor chooses not to participate in the program?

The truth, of course, is that your contributions are not put aside. Social Security is simply a tax. Like all taxes, the money collected is spent immediately as general revenues to fund the federal government. The Social Security trust fund does not exist, and Social Security “surpluses” are nothing more than an accounting ledger showing that contributions exceeded benefits paid for a given calendar year-- not that the excess was put aside. Social Security benefits are paid each year from general funds, like other federal programs. Since these programs and overall spending keep increasing, the government can’t give up any sources of tax revenue. Allowing people to opt out of Social Security would force the federal government to admit it has been stealing money from Social Security for decades.

The administration speaks of private accounts, but government-managed investment of Social Security funds is not privatization at all. True capitalism by definition operates without government interference, and we should oppose further government involvement in the financial markets. After all, which government officials will decide what stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other investment vehicles are approved? Which politicians will you trust to decide what your portfolio may contain? Imagine the lobbyists fighting over which special interests will have their favored investments approved for Social Security accounts. Political favoritism, rather than market performance, will determine what investments are allowed, and Social Security in essence will become a huge source of taxpayer-provided investment capital.

If the administration truly wants to give people more control over their retirement dollars, why not simply reduce payroll taxes and let them keep their own money to invest privately as they see fit? This is the true private solution.

Your money has never been safe in the government’s hands, and it never will be. Governments spend money; it’s just their nature. It is preposterous to believe our government is capable of simply sitting on a huge pile of money without touching it because it’s earmarked for one purpose or another. No matter what politicians promise, Social Security reform will not change the fact that your money is taken from your paycheck and sent to Washington, where it will be spent.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ronpaul; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: TXBSAFH
My plan is similar, put all elected officials on commission. Pay them a percentage of the GDP minus percentages for the trade deficit, unemployment, the interest rate, and a percentage of the deficit. They would not be getting paid now and would not start seeing a check until things improve. If the country does great, their pay will be deservedly high.
81 posted on 01/25/2005 10:25:40 AM PST by Boiling point (If God had not meant for man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bluebeak
What's unrealistic about letting people do with their own money what they want? I mean, how many people out there are clamoring to be told by the government how to live their lives?
82 posted on 01/25/2005 10:55:35 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: inquest

i'm talking about political reality ... philosophically/ideally I AGREE with you.


83 posted on 01/25/2005 10:59:00 AM PST by bluebeak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: bluebeak
I'm talking about political reality also. I'm asking what large constituency out there is actually clamoring for government control over their lives, such that the GOP would risk losing elections by relinquishing that control to them. It doesn't make sense to me that that would be any kind of political liability at all.
84 posted on 01/25/2005 11:02:09 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: bluebeak
Only way the current system would be scrap overnight/in a short term period

I never said overnight. And I am unwilling to give up the fight just as we are making small progress.

85 posted on 01/25/2005 11:02:21 AM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
That is exactly the topic, and you are well aware I am male.

It is not the topic and you are a female.

LucyLibertarian

And you are a liberal troll. And you are a youngster who has pertended to be someone else, probably you are using your father's job experience to imitate him. Nice try.

And you will be leaving this forum soon. Each post shows your true colors.

Calling Bush a crook is a sure way to get the boot.

86 posted on 01/25/2005 11:08:13 AM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras; admin; jimrob
Administrator; Jim Robinson; I apologize for bothering you with this matter but Protagoras has insisting on starting a flame war with me over the proposed Social Security program changes. Now he seems to have involved you in this issue. The following should make it perfectly clear where I stand on the issue and my position in this flame war initiated by Protagoras.

Protagoras has repeatedly pinged me and FReepmailed me to threads supposedly for an education in Social Security but when I respond to specific items in the threads he calls me a liar resorts to juvenile name calling and refuses to answer questions directly instead he responds with generalities while claiming he has answered the questions. I have also observed him using the same tactics on others.

He/She has repeatedly threatened me for disagreeing with him. I do not feel that I have done anything that is over the line but if I have done so please let me know.

LucyLibertarian

Lucy was my Grandmother and she was my guiding influence in creating my political philosophy. She was raised in the Texas Panhandle. She later raised three children on her own through the Depression on a homestead claim in Oklahoma. That was a very hard life and it forged a very strong libertarian political philosophy. But it also made her highly aware of the realities of life and of government.

Her initials were LPM and 1888 was the year of her birth. You might note that the year is 1888 not 1988.

I chose her initials as a screen-name to honor her influence and memory. I made that quite clear when I requested the name change that I was doing so to honor my Grandmother.

She was definitely what today would be called a libertarian and was politically active but she also was very aware of the stabilizing effect that the Social Security program had on America.

Some of the things that she taught me that pertain to the Social Security discussions are as follows.

1. The Depression was caused by speculation in the Stock Market. Speculation is akin to gambling and you don't want your security tied up with something that is essentially a gamble. Private Investment accounts are essentially a gamble with everyones retirement financial security.

2. After the Depression America was in deep trouble, the separation between the rich and the poor had reached the point that many people were losing hope and beginning to consider other forms of government. If you will search your history books you will find that the Communist party was gaining in strength at that time. After the Social Security program was created that influence began to wain. If the Social Security system is weakened the American Government will fall under the control of the first party to offer the American voters a check.

3. Never ever trust a politician especially when they tell you they are going to help you. Even if their intentions are honorable they will screw it up anyway.

Ron Paul is the only politician I have seen in a long time who is honest about what he has to say. It is very refreshing but he also is very ineffective. Washington has become so corrupted that he doesn't have a chance.

I have made it quite clear in the past that I do not trust any politicians. I am not attacking President Bush but I am very aware of the corrupting effect financial influences have on Washington.

I will not change my political philosophy to please you or anyone else.

My Father passed away in 1959 when I was 8 years old and I am male. The background I have stated is definitely my own.

Would you also like to debate the application of high speed networking to Energy Management Systems or how about the design of Emergency Load Shed Systems. My consulting fee for those services begins at $125.00 per hour plus expenses but for you I'll make a special exception.

Here is the how I believe that Social Security should be reformed:

1. Pass a Constitutional Amendment that imposes a tariff on imported manufactured goods and services. The funds from this tariff must be strictly applied to the Social Security system. The same Amendment must prohibit the commingling of the General Fund and the Social Security program. The Tariff should be set at a rate such that the Trust Fund will be on a fiscally sound basis within 10 years.

This will serve two functions; It will begin to stop the hemorrhaging of middle class jobs from our Nation. It will also create an incentive to restore our manufacturing base. This is critical to our national defense particularly with the increasing threat from China.

2. In five years when the Social Security trust fund is sound then make available 2% of the Trust Fund for investment by an independent panel of financial experts. The best way to create this panel would be to have one University from each state appoint one person to an advisory board that would then be responsible for appointing a panel of twelve financial experts who would have the actual control of the investments.

POLITICIANS MUST NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER EITHER PANEL.

That will limit the effect of corrupting influences on this panel.

3. When the investment fund has doubled the original investment then the original 2% of the Social Security Trust is returned to the trust fund and the investment group is free to continue the investments. If the board ever loses all of the original investment then the board is disbanded and then the fund is discontinued permanently.

If the investment fund reaches 10 times the original investment then everyones individual and corporate taxes are decreased propoprtinaly to the amount over that base investment amount. Those decreases in taxes are made available for 401K programs.

If the investment fund is successful then everyone benefits through decreased taxes. If it fails we still have the base Social Security Trust Fund to maintain our National stability.

This plan is superior to other plans that I have seen discussed for the following reasons.

1. It does not create a debt to be paid by our children.

2. It does not weaken or threaten the stabilizing influence that the Social Security program has had on America.

3. It helps curb the hemorrhaging of middle class jobs and manufacturing capacity from America.

4. If the Investment Fund is successful it would eventually reduce or eliminate all Social Security taxes while encouraging private retirement accounts. 5. IT DOES NOT INCREASE THE NATIONAL DEBT.

If my political philosophy does not meet some Conservative purity test so be it. I am not changing it to please Protagoras or anyone else.

87 posted on 01/25/2005 3:00:31 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
What a wonderful story. I would have been touched if I had read past the first few sentences.

Everything you have posted since you said President Bush was paying back political contibutors with SS money has fallen on deaf ears.

When you come on a conservative website and push liberal propaganda you won't make many friends.

88 posted on 01/25/2005 8:20:04 PM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
What do you have against a plan that would:

1. Improve Social Security without increasing the National Debt.

2. Stop the hemorrhaging of middle class jobs.

3. Strengthen our national manufacturing capacity.

4. Eventually reduce or eliminate, Social Security taxes.

5. Eventually allow private investment accounts.

6. Insuring that we have a national nest egg stuck away for hard times.

7. Remove control of Social Security investments from the hands of politicians and corporate influences.

89 posted on 01/25/2005 8:55:32 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
I am unable to answer right now, I'm still choked up by the story of your family.

BTW, don't ever send me freepmail again, you have something to say, say it here on the forum. Or over at DU where you normally post.

90 posted on 01/26/2005 6:24:24 AM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
I'm don't understand why you are choked up by my families history.

My family is very proud of our roots. It is the definitive example of an American Pioneer family. We are an example of how hard work, perseverance and freedom can pay off. Perhaps you are not familiar with the history of the Oklahoma Land Rushes or the Pioneers who settled in Indian Territory, if so I would highly suggest that you discover those periods of American history. It will give you a much better understanding of what it really means to be libertarian.

Would you please explain why that would choke you up.

91 posted on 01/26/2005 9:25:18 AM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
You are not only wrong, you are demented. Go away and do whatever it is you do when not crying to management about flame wars you start and agonizingly continue.

They ignored you the last time and if you continue I'm sure they will be very impressed with your continuation of the very thing you were crying about.

Please do not post to me anymore and again please stop sending me freepmail. This is pathetic.

92 posted on 01/26/2005 9:33:02 AM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: monday
I doubt many people will read this. They don't want to know the truth about SS or if they do know the truth they don't want to think about it.

Nah. They're waiting for Big Government Bush to "fix" a Ponzi scheme.

Good luck with that.

93 posted on 01/26/2005 9:41:52 AM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: bullseye876
This man has been right for several decades.

He makes too much sense to suit the tastes of most people on this forum.

95 posted on 01/26/2005 9:47:10 AM PST by Protagoras (No one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave. GWB 1-20-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

This is the last response I will make to you unless you respond to one of my posts first. Goodbye


96 posted on 01/26/2005 11:02:10 AM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson