Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigLusr
But the stop was legit... and if Caballes hadn't posessed any marijuana the cops would not have invaded his privacy.

Do you know the false positive rate of sniff searches?

236 posted on 01/24/2005 11:07:11 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
From the opinion of the court.

Although respondant argues that error rates, particularly the existence of false positives, call into question the premise that drug detection dogs alert only to contraband, the record contains no evidence or findings that support his argument.

If false positives are a real problem, Caballes needs a new lawyer.

Besides... Cops can't be required to present undeniable proof before being allowed search a car. So even if a dog sometimes alerts officers to something other than contraband, as long as it's reasonable to assume contraband is probably present... the search should be legal.

252 posted on 01/24/2005 11:16:01 AM PST by bigLusr (Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta

I've never smelled marijuana on someone that didn't look stoned.


260 posted on 01/24/2005 11:21:08 AM PST by westmichman (Pray for global warming. (Thank G-D for the red states))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson