Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants

Now it is time for me to be a naysayer. I have heard conflicting reports about oil reserves and I tend to believe those who say the reserve is decreasing.
The big problem I see with the oil futures you are trying to bolster is that none of the reserve is in America except ANWAR and some of the Gulf of Mexico. Problem with those reserves is if they are not tapped we cannot count on that supply before it hits the pipeline. I don't see that happening any time soon enough to alleviate the price gouging speculators. Getting greedy with possibly fabricated supply and production estimates, in collaboration with unstable foreign cartels, has nothing that provides me with a picture of security.

I am sure there are many reserves of oil that could be tapped eventually as technology allows. But political climate in those areas does not favor America. In the mean time, I think the safe bet would be on what else we can do in America to conserve, and develop alternatives.

100 years ago oil was of little value. Now the value of oil dictates the world's economy. The value of oil favors greed. The value of oil gives credibility and power to destructive dictators and regimes. Even 60 years ago Hitler and the Japanese Empire knew that control of oil was control of the world economy.

Even now some say we are fighting a war because of oil and I can't agree more. If there was no oil in the Middle East our interest in the region would be akin to Antartica's cold. The dictators of the region would have no collateral to buy weapons, and no reason to conquer their neighbors. And we would feel no strategic need to protect the people so we can get our oil.

Go ahead and count on the oil. I think I will put my stock in American ingenuity. I can follow a power line to the source and somewhat feel comfort knowing how it gets here. But the oil pipeline runs red with blood stains and crosses lands that are unforgiving and deadly.


134 posted on 01/25/2005 7:08:28 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: o_zarkman44

I agree. However, we simply do not have the energy and equipment and infrastructure required to use hydrogen as a fuel. Also the BTU density of hydrogen is relatively low and that means you need an much larger fuel tank. And forget about the envirowhackos allowing nuke power plants to be built.

Like it or not, oil is what we will be using for the next couple of decades at least.


136 posted on 01/25/2005 7:46:50 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson