[Dimensio]

Tell me, precisely *how* do you claim that we can have a species originate without having a new life form originate?

I get the impression that you know that you're wrong, but you're playing semantic games to avoid admitting a mistake.

The theory of evolution does not address how the first life form(s) came into existence. The theory of evolution has never addressed how the first life form(s) came into existence. The only people who assert that the theory of evolution has ever addressed the ultimate origin of life are people who have never studied the theory of evolution and creationists who can't use honest arguments so they resort to lies.

[Southack]

"I get the impression that you know that you're wrong, but you're playing semantic games to avoid admitting a mistake."

Yet another mistaken impression, then.

[narby]

The only people who assert that the theory of evolution has ever addressed the ultimate origin of life are people who have never studied the theory of evolution and creationists who can't use honest arguments so they resort to lies.

Sadsack definitly is off the deep end. But I don't know if I believe that most creationists who make that claim are lying. I think most are honest, they just don't have a clue.

But those on these threads where such discussions have been brought up numerious times and still make claims like this (and the "theory" thing too), I agree are just dishonest. If they had any real way to rebut our claims, they would. But they never even try.

They just shout louder "IT'S ONLY A THEORY" like they were James Carville. Unfortunatly, 45% of the country believes Carville, and these clowns might have an even bigger following.