[Southack]

No, that math is *precisely* what we are discussing (but you'd actually have to read the thread that I gave you to begin with).

"I have no intention of wading through a whole 'nother thread. Provide your math or STFU!"

The math *is* provided in the thread that I gave to you. That you want to clutter up this thread (when even after so doing you would still be unable to show math of your own to refute it) serves no useful purpose.

Go to the link. "Wade" through that thread. It's an entire thread of math (the same math that you bizarrely keep requesting).

[WildTurkey]

Go to the link. "Wade" through that thread. It's an entire thread of math (the same math that you bizarrely keep requesting).

And I have already give you a link that refutes it all. I guess that makes us even!

[WildTurkey]

Go to the link. "Wade" through that thread. It's an entire thread of math (the same math that you bizarrely keep requesting).

The thread is 685 posts long. Get real and post your math.

[WildTurkey]

The math *is* provided in the thread that I gave to you. That you want to clutter up this thread (when even after so doing you would still be unable to show math of your own to refute it) serves no useful purpose.

And in that thread is proof of the errors of your math. Post 650 there abouts.

[WildTurkey]

Go to the link. "Wade" through that thread. It's an entire thread of math (the same math that you bizarrely keep requesting).

Thank you for providing a link to a source that totally refutes your contention.