To: WildTurkey
"Your link goes to this. Nothing about what we are discussing." 
No, that math is *precisely* what we are discussing (but you'd actually have to read the thread that I gave you to begin with).
The mathematical probabilities for unaided processes sequencing instruction sets (e.g. DNA) are absolutely valid for a discussion of abiogenesis, Intelligent Design, and Evolutionary Theory.
380 posted on
01/22/2005 8:43:45 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
No, that math is *precisely* what we are discussing (but you'd actually have to read the thread that I gave you to begin with). I have no intention of wading through a whole 'nother thread. Provide your math or STFU!
385 posted on
01/22/2005 8:47:22 PM PST by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Southack
The mathematical probabilities for unaided processes sequencing instruction sets (e.g. DNA) are absolutely valid for a discussion of abiogenesis, Intelligent Design, and Evolutionary Theory. Science does not believe that DNA was the first molecule capable of Evolution. And calculations of abiogenesis are irrelevant to Evolution.
We told you that. But you are either to dense to even understand the argument, or dishonest and pretending not to notice our points.
386 posted on
01/22/2005 8:48:36 PM PST by
narby
( A truly Intelligent Designer, would have designed Evolution)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson