[Southack]

"I just went to your link. The caculation is about monkeys reproducing Hamlet. It has no calculations on the probability of life."

Ahhh, 345 posts into the debate, you *finally* review the math! Clever boy, aren't you?!

Yes, the calculations are for the probability of *sequencing*; the sequencing of "random" letters typed into words, the sequencing of genetic DNA programming instructions into viable life forms, the sequencing of numbers into a winning lottery ticket...the sequencing for anything and everything based upon aided or unaided (specifically) processes.

In relation to this thread, the unaided sequencing of billions of genetic programming instructions into viable DNA might, if you continue to become more clever, begin to slowly intrigue you.

I hold out such hope for you, at the very least.

[narby]

Look ack, I don't care what your math says. The fact is that no one claims to know the exact sequence of the first life on earth. So whatever your calculator tells you, it BS because neither you or anyone else knows what formula to plug in.

And even if they did, what's that got to do with Evolution? NOTHING. Evolution still occured, however life began.

Your math is irrelevant.

[WildTurkey]

the sequencing of genetic DNA programming instructions into viable life forms,

I must have missed that. Can you enlighten me?