And it's been shown to be laughable. Do you not understand even the obvious?
Now, since I've shown my work, your next post must be to show *your* math to the contrary (you can't).
You mean since you've shown sh!t, we should throw some back at you?
You're simply pathetic.
Oook, oook!
I've done the math. It's 69% probable. Nice round number. Prove I'm wrong!
"And it's been shown to be laughable. Do you not understand even the obvious?"
You are welcome to post *any* math that conclusively disproves the original math that I linked to for this thread, but up to this post you have not yet listed such equations (nor can you, I suspect).
No, I'm simply *scientific*. I've provided you math, logic, and concrete examples both *for* Intelligent Design (e.g. artificial intelligence, computer viri, cloning, self-replicating machines, etc.) as well as that could falsify ID in many (perhaps even all) circumstances (e.g. Steen Rasmussen's current experiment at Los Alamos).
In response, you've been reduced to name-calling. I typically reduce posters such as yourself to profane outbursts in mere minutes. It's dead easy to do.
Yawn. Perhaps *some* day, a more intelligent debater will at least play a decent devil's advocate (oh my, this *must* be some sort of secret religious pun!) will come along and actually post mathematical equations and counter-examples, but until then, I suppose I must live with what very little intellectual stimulation posters such as yourself provide (i.e. not much).