[Southack]

"It always comes down to that decision for anyone with a brain reading your stuff."

No, it just comes down to math.

Speaking of which, perhaps in your *next* post you'll show your math that somehow contradicts my own.

Not!

[VadeRetro]

Plenty of nice math here. I'll copy Dan Day's farewell to you inline, as that, too, says it for me.

Either way, you're a lost cause, don't expect much more of my time. My work here is done, I've exposed you as a charlatan and/or a fool too many times to count now. Whether or not you're able to admit it, the lurkers should be quite able to see the shoddy quality of the anti-evolution arguments.

"Monkeys" my hind end. Come back when you're able to properly analyze self-sustaining organic chemical cycles and *then* we'll talk.

Note his specific criticism is that, even as I told you some posts ago, you not only didn't model every conceivable unaided process, you utterly failed to address the specific process put forth by mainstream science.

If you've ever done that anywhere, please show your work and I'll get back to you. If that thread is all you've got, you are making unsubstantiated assertions and [once yet again] all you have for defense is that nobody can make Southack see.

I expect you will have the last word and that your next post will be it.