Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Salvador option
Aljazeera ^ | 20 Jan 2005 | Scott Ritter

Posted on 01/22/2005 2:51:18 AM PST by Cornpone

By any standard, the ongoing American occupation of Iraq is a disaster.

The highly vaunted US military machine, laurelled and praised for its historic march on Baghdad in March and April of 2003, today finds itself a broken force, on the defensive in a land that it may occupy in part, but does not control.

The all-out offensive to break the back of the resistance in Falluja has failed, leaving a city destroyed by American firepower, and still very much in the grips of the anti-American fighters.

The same is true of Mosul, Samarra, or any other location where the US military has undertaken “decisive” action against the fighters, only to find that, within days, the fighting has returned, stronger than ever.

And yet, it now appears as if the United States, in an effort to take the offensive against the fighters in Iraq, is prepared to compound its past mistakes in Iraq by embarking on a new course of action derived from some of the darkest, and most embarrassing moments of America's modern history.

According to press accounts, the Pentagon is considering the organisation, training and equipping of so-called death squads, teams of Iraqi assassins who would be used to infiltrate and eliminate the leadership of the Iraqi resistance.

Called the Salvador Option, in reference to similar US-backed death squads that terrorised the population of El Salvador during the 1980s, the proposed plan actually has as its roots the Phoenix assassination programme undertaken during the Vietnam war, where American-led assassins killed thousands of known or suspected Vietcong collaborators.

Perhaps it is a sign of the desperation felt inside the Pentagon, or an underscoring of the ideological perversity of those in charge, that the US military would draw upon the failed programmes of the past to resolve an insoluble problem of today.

The Salvador Option would not be the first embrace of assassination as a tool of occupation undertaken by the United States in Iraq.

In the months following Paul Bremer's taking over of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in June 2003, the streets of Baghdad crawled with scores of assassination squads.

Among the more effective and brutal of these units were those drawn from the Badr Brigade, the armed militia of the Shia political party known as the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, or SCIRI.

Although not publicly acknowledged, the role played by the various anti-Saddam militias in confronting the residual elements of Saddam's former ruling Baath Party offered a glimpse into what was, and is, an unspoken element of the US policy regarding de-Baathification - let the Iraqis do the dirty work.

SCIRI's efforts to exterminate Baath Party remnants still loyal to Saddam Hussein, or who stand accused of committing crimes against SCIRI or its sympathisers, attracted the attention of the “black” side of the CPA-run de-Baathification efforts – covert operations run by the CIA and elite Special Operations units of the United States military.

Of all the various players in this deadly game, the Badr militia stood out as the most willing and able to take the fight to the Baathist holdouts.

Tipped off by the CPA's covert operatives, the Badr assassination squads killed dozens of Baathists in and around Baghdad.

But the assassination of former Baathists did nothing to pacify Iraq.

The ongoing resistance to the American occupation of Iraq was not founded in the formal structure of the Baath Party, but rather the complex mixture of tribal and religious motivations which had, since 1995, been blended into the secretive cell structure of the Baath Party.

While the Americans and their SCIRI allies focused on bringing to heel former Baathists, the resistance morphed into a genuine grassroots national liberation movement where strategic planning may very well be the product of former Baathists, but the day-to-day tactical decisions are more likely to be made by tribal shaikhs and local clerics.

The increasing success of the resistance was attributed in part to the failure of the CPA-ordered de-Baathification policy.

History, on the other hand, treats harshly the occupying power which resorts to the use of the tools of terror to subdue an occupied people.

In an effort to reverse this trend, Bremer rescinded his de-Baathification programme, and ordered the Badr assassination squads to stand down.

This change of policy direction could not change the reality on the ground in Iraq, however.

The Sunni-based resistance, having been targeted by the Badr assassins, struck back with a vengeance.

In a campaign of targeted assassinations using car bombs and ambushes, the resistance has engaged in its own campaign of terror against the Shia, viewed by the Sunni fighters as being little more than collaborators of the American occupation.

Having started the game of politically motivated assassination, the US has once again found itself trumped by forces inside Iraq it does not understand, and as such will never be able to defeat.

The Salvador Option fails on a number of levels. First and foremost is the moral and ethical one.

While it is difficult at times to understand and comprehend, let alone justify, the tactics used by the Iraqi resistance, history has shown that the tools of remote ambush, instead of a direct assassination, have always been used by freedom fighters when confronting an illegitimate foreign occupier who possesses overwhelming conventional military superiority.

As such, history celebrates the resistance of the French and the Russians when occupied by the Germans during the second world war, the Chinese resistance to Japanese occupation during that same time, or even the decades-long national liberation movement in Vietnam which defeated not only the French and the Americans, but also the illegitimate government these two occupiers attempted to impose on the people of South Vietnam.

History, on the other hand, treats harshly the occupying power which resorts to the use of the tools of terror to subdue an occupied people.

Thus, while it is fine for a French resistance fighter to blow up a German troop train, it is not acceptable for the Germans to burn a French village in retaliation.

The US military has undertaken “decisive” action against the fighters, only to find that, within days, the fighting has returned, stronger than ever.

History will eventually depict as legitimate the efforts of the Iraqi resistance to destabilise and defeat the American occupation forces and their imposed Iraqi collaborationist government.

And history will condemn the immorality of the American occupation, which has debased the values and ideals of the American people by legitimising torture, rape and murder as a means of furthering an illegal war of aggression.

Ethics aside, the Salvador Option will fail simply because it cannot succeed. In an effort to confront a Sunni-based resistance, the Pentagon proposes that special assassination squads be recruited from the ranks of “loyal” Kurds and Shia.

In the 30 years of Saddam's rule, the Baathist government and its security organs were very successful in infiltrating the ranks of Kurdish and Shia opposition movements.

The Shia and Kurds, on the other hand, have no history of being able to do the same to the Sunni. If anything has emerged as the undisputable truth in post-invasion Iraq, it is that the Iraqi resistance knows Iraq infinitely better than the American occupiers.

If implemented, the Salvador Option will serve as the impetus for all-out civil war. In the same manner that the CPA-backed assassination of Baathists prompted the restructuring and strengthening of the Sunni-led resistance, any effort by US-backed Kurdish and Shia assassination teams to target Sunni resistance leaders will remove all impediments for a general outbreak of ethnic and religious warfare in Iraq.

It is hard as an American to support the failure of American military operations in Iraq. Such failure will bring with it the death and wounding of many American service members, and many more Iraqis.

As an American, I have hoped that there was a way for America to emerge victorious in Iraq, with our national security and honour intact, and Iraq itself a better nation than the one we “liberated”. But it is far too late for this to happen.

The Salvador Option would not be the first embrace of assassination as a tool of occupation undertaken by the United States in Iraq.

We not only invaded Iraq on false pretences, but we perverted the notion of liberation by removing Saddam and his cronies from his palaces, replacing them with American occupiers who have not only kept open Saddam's most notorious prisons, but also the practice of torture, rape and abuse we were supposed to be bringing to an end.

Faced with our inability to come to grips with a popular-based resistance that has grown exponentially over the past year, the best the American policy planners can come up with is to embrace our own form of terrorism, supporting death squads we cannot control and which will only further debase the moral foundation of our nation while slaughtering even more Iraqis.

As an American, I hope and pray that common sense and basic morality prevail in Washington DC, terminating the Salvador Option before it gets off the ground. Failing that, I hope that the programme of US-backed death squads is defeated. That is the most pro-American sentiment I can muster, given the situation as it currently stands.

Scott Ritter was a senior UN arms inspector in Iraq between 1991 and 1998. He is now an independent consultant.

The opinions expressed here are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position or have the endorsement of Aljazeera.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: lackey; ritter; scottritter; slime; terrorism; terrorist; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Remember Scott?
1 posted on 01/22/2005 2:51:20 AM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Targetting terrorists is fine by me.
Targetting the civilian populaiton en masse is not.


2 posted on 01/22/2005 2:53:35 AM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

You would think Scott would want to avoid the use of the word "perverted."


3 posted on 01/22/2005 2:57:50 AM PST by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Scotty Ritter, The Child Molestor? Yeah sure, the world remembers that lowlife, two-bit, dirtbag punk.


4 posted on 01/22/2005 3:00:22 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Scott Ritter, aka. "Senior American Child Molester"

I can't make up my mind, either he has simply sold his sole for fifteen minutes of frame, or some powerful people have pictures of Scott doing his best Michael Jackson imitation.


5 posted on 01/22/2005 3:02:08 AM PST by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Let me see if I can get the gist of this story.

America sucks and everything we are doing there is wrong.

Yeah, that sounds about right coming from the pedophile.
6 posted on 01/22/2005 3:03:07 AM PST by Simmy2.5 (DUmmies in mourning. World is a better place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Yea, I remember him.

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

Ritter and Aljazeera deserve each other.

7 posted on 01/22/2005 3:04:02 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

My point is does anyone believe what this traitor and modern day Benedict Arnold says? He's a paid, captive lackey of the Arab media funded by the Saudis. I'm surrounded by these scum in Northern Virginia who have sold their birthright for Arab oil money.


8 posted on 01/22/2005 3:05:34 AM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Nah.

Just read some links on his internet activities. I cannot believe this is not front page news. He must have some pretty good connections.


9 posted on 01/22/2005 3:06:56 AM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Scott Ritter? Queer guys for the UN? No, pediophiles for saddamn.
10 posted on 01/22/2005 3:09:47 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

I saw the author and did not bother to read it.


11 posted on 01/22/2005 3:11:46 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
This is one of the biggest lies I have read in some time. The writer is a is working for the other side.
12 posted on 01/22/2005 3:13:25 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Sorry -- I neglected the barf alert...wise choice.


13 posted on 01/22/2005 3:14:29 AM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

How much are they paying this idiot?


14 posted on 01/22/2005 3:20:15 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

The democRAT "base" raises another one of it's ugly heads.


15 posted on 01/22/2005 3:23:14 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

What I'd like to know: Who originally pee'd in this guy's Wheaties? Scott Ritter & Al Jazeera....a marriage made in heaven.


16 posted on 01/22/2005 3:30:42 AM PST by hoosier_RW_conspirator (the underwear-less tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Oh, yeah. Who can forget Scott, the guy who admits he saw a children's prison in Iraq while doing inspections and decided to cover that up and not to report it because if he had told the world about what he saw there there would be an outcry for war...


17 posted on 01/22/2005 3:34:37 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
"Oh, yeah. Who can forget Scott, the guy who admits he saw a children's prison in Iraq while doing inspections and decided to cover that up and not to report it because if he had told the world about what he saw there there would be an outcry for war..."

Just the kind of guy we need defining the moral conscience or our country. My hero...not!

18 posted on 01/22/2005 3:42:09 AM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Just call him delusioal-man...

Someone had to take over Baghdad Bob's job and I guess no iraqi was willing to work so cheap - if at all- to apologize and promote evil. So here is Scotty instead to do the dirty deed...

He just LOVES terrorists- that's evident in every tenderly written, sleezy word he writes.

I guess he has nothing to fear from terrorists, unlike Michael Berg or Danny Pearl or too many innocent Iraqis- it's hard for a terrorist to cut the head off of someoe who won't stop kissing their asses.

19 posted on 01/22/2005 3:43:43 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

1999 : (UNSCOM : RITTER INVITED TO IRAQ BY THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT; LATER MEETS AL-KAFIJII) Ritter said he was first invited to Baghdad last year (in 1999) by the Iraqi government after the publication of his book "Endgame," which argued that the continuation of economic sanctions on Iraq was more "evil" than doing business with Saddam Hussein. "They were shocked by my position in the book," Ritter said. Ritter said that several months later, at a hearing on Capitol Hill, he met Iraqi-born American businessman Shakir Alkafajii, who had heard Ritter attack U.S. policy toward Iraq. Alkafajii asked what Ritter could do to end the sanctions and break the impasse in relations between the United States and Iraq. "I said I could do a documentary," Ritter answered. Alkafajii, who is accompanying Ritter as a "translator and cultural adviser," secured the travel visas for the crew and agreed to put up a $400,000 line of credit to finance the documentary. - "Ex-UN Inspector Ritter to Tour Iraq, Make Documentary ," by Colum Lynch, Washington Post via globalpolicy.org, July 27, 2000

That's it... al Kafajii /alKhafaji of Oil-for-Food scandal fame. And the $400,000 bribe is money not spent on feeding Iraqi kids...

20 posted on 01/22/2005 3:50:02 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson