[ClearCase_guy]

What is it about plain language that confuses people?

In 2000, the problem with Bush was that he lacked "gravitas"
In 2004, the problem with Bush is that he has "hubris".

And, always, the problem is that he speaks in simple language!

[MichaelP]

In 2004, the problem with Bush is that he has "hubris".

And there numbers wane, wane, wane....

Mike

[woofie]

In 2000, the problem with Bush was that he lacked "gravitas"

In 2004, the problem with Bush is that he has "hubris".

I thought the problem was :

He was an idiot

Now he is an evil genius

[Alia]

The whole "hubris" talking points lemming agenda. It's their attempt to tell the world that the US doesn't have what it takes, techwise, moneywise, etc. The lefties worked hard to belittle the US JUST to make the outraged countries feel so much better about themselves. And are thereby setting the stage so that as the US does deploy its newer arsenal, both tactical and strategic, the left can be ready to assert that "Bush Lied and Didn't Tell Us We had Bought This Stuff". More of the anti-nuke, anti-Salt treaties stuffola.

The stage is definitely getting set up.

[Alia]

The whole "hubris" talking points lemming agenda. It's their attempt to tell the world that the US doesn't have what it takes, techwise, moneywise, etc. The lefties worked hard to belittle the US JUST to make the outraged countries feel so much better about themselves. And are thereby setting the stage so that as the US does deploy its newer arsenal, both tactical and strategic, the left can be ready to assert that "Bush Lied and Didn't Tell Us We had Bought This Stuff". More of the anti-nuke, anti-Salt treaties stuffola.

The stage is definitely getting set up.

[beyond the sea]

In 2000, the problem with Bush was that he lacked "gravitas" In 2004, the problem with Bush is that he has "hubris".

LOL! A gravitas-less hubris-laden Texan. What a bummer.

;-)